期刊文献+

Predictive value of symptoms and demographics in diagnosing malignancy or peptic stricture

Predictive value of symptoms and demographics in diagnosing malignancy or peptic stricture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To determine which features of history and demographics predict a diagnosis of malignancy or peptic stricture in patients presenting with dysphagia.METHODS:A prospective case-control study of 2000 consecutive referrals(1031 female,age range:17-103 years) to a rapid access service for dysphagia,based in a teaching hospital within the United Kingdom,over 7 years.The service consists of a nurse-led telephone triage followed by investigation(barium swallow or gastroscopy),if appropriate,within 2 wk.Logistic regression analysis of demographic and clinical variables was performed.This includes age,sex,duration of dysphagia,whether to liquids or solids,and whether there are associated features(reflux,odynophagia,weight loss,regurgitation).We determined odds ratio(OR) for these variables for the diagnoses of malignancy and peptic stricture.We determined the value of the Edinburgh Dysphagia Score(EDS) in predicting cancer in our cohort.Multivariate logistic regression was performed and P < 0.05 considered significant.The local ethics committee confirmed ethics approval was not required(audit).RESULTS:The commonest diagnosis is gastro-esophageal reflux disease(41.3%).Malignancy(11.0%) and peptic stricture(10.0%) were also relatively common.Malignancies were diagnosed by histology(97%) or on radiological criteria,either sequential barium swallows showing progression of disease or unequivocal evidence of malignancy on computed tomography.The majority of malignancies were esophago-gastric in origin but ear,nose and throat tumors,pancreatic cancer and extrinsic compression from lung or mediastinal metastatic cancer were also found.Malignancy was statistically more frequent in older patients(aged >73 years,OR 1.1-3.3,age < 60 years 6.5%,60-73 years 11.2%,> 73 years 11.8%,P < 0.05),males(OR 2.2-4.8,males 14.5%,females 5.6%,P < 0.0005),short duration of dysphagia(≤ 8 wk,OR 4.5-20.7,16.6%,8-26 wk 14.5%,> 26 wk 2.5%,P < 0.0005),progressive symptoms(OR 1.3-2.6:progressive 14.8%,intermittent 9.3%,P < 0.001),with weight loss of ≥ 2 kg(OR 2.5-5.1,weight loss 22.1%,without weight loss 6.4%,P < 0.0005) and without reflux(OR 1.2-2.5,reflux 7.2%,no reflux 15.5%,P < 0.0005).The likelihood of malignancy was greater in those who described true dysphagia(food or drink sticking within 5 s of swallowing than those who did not(15.1%vs 5.2% respectively,P < 0.001).The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the EDS were 98.4%,9.3%,11.8% and 98.0% respectively.Three patients with an EDS of 3(high risk EDS ≥ 3.5) had malignancy.Unlike the original validation cohort,there was no difference in likelihood of malignancy based on level of dysphagia(pharyngeal level dysphagia 11.9% vs mid sternal or lower sternal dysphagia 12.4%).Peptic stricture was statistically more frequent in those with longer duration of symptoms(> 6 mo,OR 1.2-2.9,≤ 8 wk 9.8%,8-26 wk 10.6%,> 26 wk 15.7%,P < 0.05) and over 60 s(OR 1.2-3.0,age < 60 years 6.2%,60-73 years 10.2%,> 73 years 10.6%,P < 0.05).CONCLUSION:Malignancy and peptic stricture are frequent findings in those referred with dysphagia.The predictive value for associated features could help determine need for fast track investigation whilst reducing service pressures. AIM:To determine which features of history and demographics predict a diagnosis of malignancy or peptic stricture in patients presenting with dysphagia.METHODS:A prospective case-control study of 2000 consecutive referrals(1031 female,age range:17-103 years) to a rapid access service for dysphagia,based in a teaching hospital within the United Kingdom,over 7 years.The service consists of a nurse-led telephone triage followed by investigation(barium swallow or gastroscopy),if appropriate,within 2 wk.Logistic regression analysis of demographic and clinical variables was performed.This includes age,sex,duration of dysphagia,whether to liquids or solids,and whether there are associated features(reflux,odynophagia,weight loss,regurgitation).We determined odds ratio(OR) for these variables for the diagnoses of malignancy and peptic stricture.We determined the value of the Edinburgh Dysphagia Score(EDS) in predicting cancer in our cohort.Multivariate logistic regression was performed and P 〈 0.05 considered significant.The local ethics committee confirmed ethics approval was not required(audit).RESULTS:The commonest diagnosis is gastro-esophageal reflux disease(41.3%).Malignancy(11.0%) and peptic stricture(10.0%) were also relatively common.Malignancies were diagnosed by histology(97%) or on radiological criteria,either sequential barium swallows showing progression of disease or unequivocal evidence of malignancy on computed tomography.The majority of malignancies were esophago-gastric in origin but ear,nose and throat tumors,pancreatic cancer and extrinsic compression from lung or mediastinal metastatic cancer were also found.Malignancy was statistically more frequent in older patients(aged 〉73 years,OR 1.1-3.3,age 〈 60 years 6.5%,60-73 years 11.2%,〉 73 years 11.8%,P 〈 0.05),males(OR 2.2-4.8,males 14.5%,females 5.6%,P 〈 0.0005),short duration of dysphagia(≤ 8 wk,OR 4.5-20.7,16.6%,8-26 wk 14.5%,〉 26 wk 2.5%,P 〈 0.0005),progressive symptoms(OR 1.3-2.6:progressive 14.8%,intermittent 9.3%,P 〈 0.001),with weight loss of ≥ 2 kg(OR 2.5-5.1,weight loss 22.1%,without weight loss 6.4%,P 〈 0.0005) and without reflux(OR 1.2-2.5,reflux 7.2%,no reflux 15.5%,P 〈 0.0005).The likelihood of malignancy was greater in those who described true dysphagia(food or drink sticking within 5 s of swallowing than those who did not(15.1%vs 5.2% respectively,P 〈 0.001).The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the EDS were 98.4%,9.3%,11.8% and 98.0% respectively.Three patients with an EDS of 3(high risk EDS ≥ 3.5) had malignancy.Unlike the original validation cohort,there was no difference in likelihood of malignancy based on level of dysphagia(pharyngeal level dysphagia 11.9% vs mid sternal or lower sternal dysphagia 12.4%).Peptic stricture was statistically more frequent in those with longer duration of symptoms(〉 6 mo,OR 1.2-2.9,≤ 8 wk 9.8%,8-26 wk 10.6%,〉 26 wk 15.7%,P 〈 0.05) and over 60 s(OR 1.2-3.0,age 〈 60 years 6.2%,60-73 years 10.2%,〉 73 years 10.6%,P 〈 0.05).CONCLUSION:Malignancy and peptic stricture are frequent findings in those referred with dysphagia.The predictive value for associated features could help determine need for fast track investigation whilst reducing service pressures.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第32期4357-4362,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 人口统计学 恶性肿瘤 统计预测 消化道 Logistic回归分析 狭窄 诊断 症状 Dysphagia Deglutition disorders Esophageal neoplasms Esophageal stenosis Gastroscopy Barium swallow Predictive value of tests
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Office for National Statistics. Cancer Statistics registrations: Registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2007, England. Series MB1 no.38. 2010. Available from: URL: http: //www.ons. gov.uk/ons/rel/vsobl/cancer-statistics-registrations-eng- land-series-mb1-/no-38-2007/cancer-registration-statistics. pdf. (Accessed 17/07/12).
  • 2ISD Online. Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Survival data, 2012. Available from: URL: http: //www.isdscotland.org/ Health-Topics/Cancer/Publications/2012-04-24/Cancer_in _Scotland_summary_m.pdf. (Accessed 17/07/12).
  • 3Northern Ireland Cancer Registry. Oesophagus. Incidence and survival, 1993-2010. Available from: URL: http:// www.qub.ac.uk/research-centres/nicr/CancerData/Onlin- eStatistics/Oesophagus/. (Accessed 18/07/12).
  • 4Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit. Cancer Incidence in Wales, 2009. Available from: URL: http:// www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/Documents/242/Cancer Inci- dence in Wales 2003-2007.pdf. (Accessed 17/07/12).
  • 5Department of Health. Guidance on commissioning cancer services: improving outcomes in upper gastro-intestinal cancers - the manual. London: Department of Health, 2001. Available from: URL: http: //pro.mountvernoncancernet- work.nhs.uk/assets/Uploads/documents/IOG-Upper-GI- Manual.pdf. (Accessed 17/07/12).
  • 6Kapoor N, Bassi A, Sturgess R, Bodger K. Predictive value of alarm features in a rapid access upper gastrointestinal cancer service. Gut 2005; 54:40-45.
  • 7Lindgren S, Janzon L. Prevalence of swallowing complaints and clinical findings among 50-79-year-old men and women in an urban population. Dysphagia 1991; 6:187-192.
  • 8Melleney EM, Subhani JM, Willoughby CP. Dysphagia referrals to a district general hospital gastroenterology unit: hard to swallow. Dysphagia 2004; 19:78-82.
  • 9Cook AJ. Diagnostic evaluation of dysphagia. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepato12008; 5:393-403.
  • 10Spechler SJ. American gastroenterological association medical position statement on treatment of patients with dysphagia caused by benign disorders of the distal esopha- gus. Gastroenterology 1999; 117:229-233.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部