期刊文献+

乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效与PI3K/mTOR通路的相关性分析 被引量:9

Relationship between the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and PI3K/mTOR pathway
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察P13K/mTOR通路状态与乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效之间的关系。方法对2009年1月至2010年11月在北京大学第一医院乳腺疾病中心接受4~6个周期包含紫杉方案新辅助化疗的105例乳腺癌患者资料进行回顾性分析。用免疫组织化学方法检测新辅助化疗前肿瘤病灶PTEN、p-AKT(Ser473)和p-mTOR(Ser2448)的表达情况,用术后病理评价新辅助化疗疗效,病理学反应级别为G4、病理完全缓解(PCR)则认为化疗有效。通过x2检验、Fisher精确概率法和双边Logistic回归探讨上述指标与新辅助化疗疗效之间的相关性。结果105例患者中新辅助化疗有效率为58.1%(61/105),其中PCR占27.6%(29/105)。PTEN、p-AKT和p-Ⅱ汀0R的阳性表达率分别为52.4%(55/105)、68.6%(72/105)、43.8%(46/105)。x2检验、Fisher精确概率法分析表明p-mTOR与新辅助化疗疗效相关(P=0.003),与获得PCR相关(P=0.001);双边Logistic回归表明p-mTOR是新辅助化疗疗效和获得PCR(均P〈0.01)的独立预测指标。p-AKT与p-roTOR表达水平差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。p-AKT与PR表达差异同样有统计学意义(P=0.035)。结论p-mTOR状态对于包含紫杉方案的新辅助化疗有预测意义,高表达患者疗效差,低表达患者更多地从化疗中获益。 Objective To explore the relationship between the status of PI3K/mTOR pathway and the therapeutic efficacies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods A total of 105 patients receiving 4 -6 cycles of taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our centre between January 2009 and November 2010 were recruited into this retrospective study. The expressions of PTEN, p-AKT (Sev473) and p-mTOR (Ser2448) were detected by immunohistochemistry before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We employed pathology to evaluate the therapeutic efficacies and considered complete response (G4) & pathologic complete response (PCR) as efficacious. Fourfold table Chi-square test and binary Logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between the above features and therapeutic efficacies. Results The overall efficacy rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 58. 1% ( 61/105 ) and the PCR rate 27.6% (29/105). The positive expression rates of PTEN, p-AKT and p-roTOR were 52.4% (57/105), 68. 6% (72/105) and 43.8% (46/105) respectively. Fourfold table Chi-square test showed the difference between p-mTOR and therapeutic efficacy was significant statistically ( P = 0. 003 ) and also the difference between p- roTOR and PCR ( P = 0. 001 ) . Binary Logistic regression showed the difference between p-mTOR and therapeutic efficiency was significant statistically, and also the difference between p-mTOR and PCR (both P 〈0. 01 ). The differential expressions of p-mTOR and p-AKT were statistically significant (P = 0. 000) and so were those of p-AKT and PR ( P = 0. 035 ). Conclusions The status of p-mTOR has predictive values for taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patients with a low level of p-mTOR are more responsive to thermotherapy while those with a high level of p-mTOR have a worse efficacy.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第34期2382-2385,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 首都医学科学发展基金(2009-1011)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 新辅助化疗 PI3K通路 预测因子 Breast neoplasms Neoadjuvant chemotherapy PI3K pathway Predictive factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16:2672-2685.
  • 2Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophospbamide for operable breast cancer: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24:2019-2027.
  • 3Tewari M, Krishnamurthy A, Shukla HS. Predictive markers of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Surg Oncol, 2008, 17:301-311.
  • 4Castaneda CA, Cortes-Funes H, Gomez HL, et al. The phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2010, 29:751-759.
  • 5Swanton C, Marani M, Pardo O, et al. Regulators of mitotic arrest and ceramide metabolism are determinants of sensitivity to paclitaxel and other chemotherapeutic drugs. Cancer Cell, 2007, 11:498-512.
  • 6Campone M, Levy V, Bourbouloux E, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus in advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer, 2009, 100: 315-321.
  • 7Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92:205-216.
  • 8Duch J, Fuster D, Mufioz M, et al. 18F-FDGPET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2009, 36:1551-1557.
  • 9Esteva FJ, Guo H, Zhang S, et al. PTEN, PIK3CA, p-AKT, and p-pTOS6K status association with trastuzumab response and survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Am J Pathol, 2010, 177:1647-1656.
  • 10Kim HS, Kim GY, Lim SJ, et al. Expression of the Mammalian target of rapamycin pathway markers in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Pathobiology, 2012,79:84-93.

二级参考文献26

  • 1Bai X, Jiang Y. Key factors in mTOR regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2010,67:239-253.
  • 2Helliwell SB, Wagner P, Kunz J, et al. TOR1 and TOR2 are structurally and functionally similar but not identical phosphatidylinositol kinase homologues in yeast. Mol Biol Cell, 1994,5 : 105-118.
  • 3Menon S, Manning BD. Common corruption of the mTOR signaling network in human tumors. Oncogene, 2008,27 Suppl 2: S43-51.
  • 4Sparks CA, Guertin DA. Targeting mTOR: prospects for mTOR complex 2 inhibitors in cancer therapy. Oneogene, 2010, 29: 3733-3744.
  • 5Meric-Bernstam F, Gonzalez-Angulo AM. Targeting the mTOR signaling network for cancer therapy. J Clin Onco|, 2009,27 : 2278-2287.
  • 6Bjornsti MA, Houghton PJ. The TOR pathway:a target for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer, 2004,4:335-348.
  • 7Slattery ML, Herrick J, Lundgreen A, et al. Genetic variation in a metabolic signaling pathway and colon and rectal cancer risk: roTOR, PTEN, STK1, RPKAA1, PRKAG2, TSC1, TSC2, PI3K, and Aktl. Carcinogenesis, 2010,31 : 1604-1611.
  • 8Pencreach E, Gu6rin E, Nicolet C, et al. Marked activity of irinotecan and rapamycin combination toward colon cancer cells in vivo and in vitro is mediated through cooperative modulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin/hypoxia-inducible factor-lalpha axis. Clin Cancer Res, 2009, 15:1297-1307.
  • 9Guba M, yon Breitenbuch P, Steinbauer M, ct al. Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat Med, 2002, 8:128-135.
  • 10黄培堂 译.分子克隆实验指南(第3版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.32-34.

共引文献14

同被引文献51

  • 1杨永德,印国兵,曾晓华.局部进展期乳腺癌趋化因子受体CXCR4的表达与新辅助化疗疗效的相关性及预后研究[J].中国癌症杂志,2011,21(6):446-451. 被引量:7
  • 2Suzuki G, Yamazaki H, Ogo E, et al. Multimodal approach for cervical esophageal carcinoma role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J]. Anticancer Res, 2014, 34 (4): 1989-1992.
  • 3Ma L, Li G, Zhu H, et al. 2-Methoxyestradiol synergizes with sorafenib to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma by si- multaneously dysregulating hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and -2 [J]. Cancer Lett, 2014, 355(1): 96-105. doi: 10. 1016/j. canlet. 2014.09.011.
  • 4Jordan VC. Tamoxifen as the first targeted long-term ad- juvant therapy for breast cancer [J], Endocr Relat Cancer, 2014, 21(3): R235-R246. doi: 10. 1530/ERC-14-0092.
  • 5Wang Y, Lei R, Zhuang X, et al. DLC 1-dependent para- thyroid hormone-like hormone inhibition suppresses breast cancer bone metastasis [J]. J Clin Invest, 2014, 124(4): 1646-1659. doi: 10. 1172/JCI71812.
  • 6Mokkapati S, Niopek K, Huang L, et al/3-catenin activa- tion in a novel liver progenitor cell type is sufficient to cause hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatoblastoma [J]. Cancer Res, 2014, 74(16): 4515-4525. doi: 10. 1158/0008-5472. CAN-13-3275.
  • 7Zhao F, Xie P, Jiang J, et al. The effect and mechanism of tamoxifen-induced hepatocyte steatosis in vitro [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2014, 15(3): 4019-4030. doi: 10. 3390/ijms15034019.
  • 8Jiang L, Xu L, Xie J, et al. Inhibition of autophagy over- comes glucocorticoid resistance in lymphoid malignant cells [J]. Cancer Biol Ther, 2015, 16(3): 466-476. doi: 10. 1080/15384047.2015. 1016658.
  • 9Miao G, Liu B, Guo X, et al. Reduction behavior induced by HL010183, a metformin derivative against the growth of cu- taneous squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Int J Clin Exp Patbol,2015, 8(1): 287-297.
  • 10Reddy YP, Chandrasekhar KB, Sadiq M, Sadiq M. A study of Nigella sativa induced growth inhibition of MCF and HepG2 cell lines: An anti-neoplastic study along with its mechanism of action [J]. Pharmacognosy Res, 2015, 7(2): 193-197. doi: 10. 4103/0974-8490. 150541.

引证文献9

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部