期刊文献+

阅读参与度和学习策略对阅读成绩的影响——基于上海PISA2009数据的实证研究 被引量:26

The Influence of Engagement in Reading and Learning Strategy on Reading Performance: Evidence-based Research with Shanghai PISA 2009 Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 学会学习是终身学习的关键能力,PISA2009从阅读参与度和学习策略两方面来研究学生在多大程度上学会了阅读领域的学习。本文首先介绍PISA2009的主要测评领域阅读中如何测量参与度和学习策略,接着用2009年PISA问卷数据说明中国上海学生在这方面所达到的水平,然后用二层回归模型分析上海学生阅读参与度和学习策略与上海学生阅读成绩的关系。研究发现,元认知策略和对阅读的喜爱程度对上海学生的阅读成绩影响最大,学校整体的参与水平和策略水平对上海学校阅读平均成绩有极显著的影响,提高阅读参与度和学习策略水平能有效克服不利社会经济背景的作用。 Learning to learn is a key competency for lifelong learning. PISA 2009 assessed the degree to which students have learned to learn in reading from two aspects: engagement in reading and approaches to learning. The paper first introduces how PISA assesses engagement and learning approaches in reading, the main domain of PISA :2009. It then explains the level that Shanghai students reached in these two aspects with the data derived from PISA 2009 student questionnaire, and explores the relationship between reading performance and reading engagement and approaches with 2-level regression model. The research finds that, the meta-cognitive strategies and enjoyment of reading have the greatest impact on reading performance of Shanghai students, and the average level of engagement and strategies of a school has significant influence on its average performance. The improvement of reading engagement and learning approaches can overcome the disadvantaged background effectively.
作者 陆璟
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第18期17-24,共8页 Research in Educational Development
基金 2010年度上海市教育科学研究重点课题"上海学生的阅读 数学和科学素养评价研究--基于PISA数据的分析"成果之一(A1002)
关键词 阅读参与度 学习策略 学习方法 元认知策略 PISA 2009 engagement in reading, learning methods, learning strategies, meta-eognitive strategies, PISA 2009
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Guthrie, J.T. and A. Wigfieid. "Engagement and Motivation in Reading"[A]. in M.L. KamiI and P.B. M osenthaI. Handbook of Reading Re- search[C]. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2000. 403-422.
  • 2McKenna, M.C., D.J. Kear and Ellsworth0. "Children's Attitudes toward Reading: A National Survey"[J]. Reading ResearchQuarterly.1995, Vol. 30, No. 4; 934-956.
  • 3Campbell, J. R., K. E.Voelkl and P. L. Donahue. NAEP 1996 trends in academic progress[M]. U.S. Department of Education,Washington DC. 1997.142.
  • 4OECD and Statistics Canada. Literacy in the information age, Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey[R].2000.
  • 5OECD. Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000[M]. OECD Publishing. 2001.104.
  • 6OECD. Reading for Change: Performance and Engagement across OECD Countries[M]. OECD Publishing.2002.107,119-120.
  • 7OECD & UNESCO-UIS. Literacy Skillsfor the World of Tomorrow Further Results from PISA[M]. OECD Publishing. 2003.182.
  • 8OECD. Learners for Life: Approaches to Learning, Paris. OECD Publishing.2003.70-71.
  • 9Nurmi, J.E., K. Aunola, K. Salmela-Aro and M. Lindroos [M]. "The Role of Success Expectation and Task-avoidance in Academic Performance and Satisfaction: Three Studies on Antecedents, Consequences and Correlates", Contemporary Education Psychology,2003, Vol. 28; 59-90.
  • 10Reading for Change: Performance and Engagement across OECD Countries[M]. OECD Publishing.108.185.

同被引文献179

引证文献26

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部