期刊文献+

省际资本流动的制度经济学分析 被引量:39

An Institutional Economics Analysis on Provincial Capital Mobility
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文测算了1997~2007年中国省际间资本流动规模,并从制度经济学的视角实证研究了制度环境对省际资本流动的影响。研究发现:东部和中西部地区分别为资本净流入和净流出地区,省际资本流动呈现不均衡格局;制度环境是决定省际资本流动的重要因素,加强产权保护、降低非税负担和缩小政府规模能够显著促进地区资本净流入,减少政府对企业的干预也有利于地区资本净流入。因此,中西部地区要改变资本净流出态势,必须切实改善当地的制度环境。 This paper measures the scale of China's provincial capital mobility, and analyses the institutional environment's effect on it in the aspect of institutional economics. The result shows that: In recent years the Eastern and the Midwestern regions are net capital inflow and outflow regions respectively, and the non-equilib- rium status of provincial movement of capital has not fundamentally changed; Insti- tutional climate is an essential element to determine the provincial capital mobility, and strengthening the protection of property rights, cutting down untaxed burden and shrinking the size of government contribute to regional net capital inflows, while reducing government intervention is beneficial to net capital in- flows. Robustness check further supports the conclusion of econometric study. Therefore, in order to change the situation of the net capital outflow, the Midwest needs to effectively improve the environment of the institution.
作者 胡凯 吴清
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期20-36,51,共18页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 教育部人文社科基金项目(10YJA790108 10YJC630283) 湖北省高等学校优秀中青年科技创新团队项目(T200808)的资助
关键词 省际资本流动 制度环境 产权保护 非税负担 政府规模 Provincial Capital Mobility Institutional Environment PropertyProtection Untaxed Burden Government Size
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Acemoglu D. and S. Johnson, 2005, Unbundling Institutions [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 113 (5): 949-995.
  • 2Arellano M. and S. Bond, 1991, Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data : Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2): 277-297.
  • 3Benassy-Quere A. , M. Coupet and T. Mayer, 2007, Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment [J]. The World Economy, 30 (5): 764-782.
  • 4Busse M. and J. L. Groizard, 2008, Foreign Direct Investment, Regulations and Growth [J]. The World Economy, 31 (7): 861-886.
  • 5Charron N. and V. Lapuente, 2011, Why Do Some Regions in Europe Have Higher Quality of Government? [R]. QOG Working Paper, No. 1.
  • 6Clarke G. R. G. , 2001, How the Quality of Institutions Affects Technological Deepening in Developing Countries[R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2603.
  • 7Daniele V. and U. Marani, 2006, Do Institutions Matter for FDI? A comparative Analysis of the MENA Countries [R]. MPRA Working Paper, No. 2426.
  • 8Feldstein M. and C. Horioka, 1980, Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows [J]. Economic Journal, 90 (3): 314-329.
  • 9Gastanaga V. M. , J.B. Nugent and B. Pashamova, 1998, Host Country Reforms and FDI Inflows: HowMuch Difference Do They Make? [J]. World Development, 26 (7): 1299-1314.
  • 10Glaeser E.L., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer, 2004, Do Institutions Cause Growth? [J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (3): 271-301.

二级参考文献74

共引文献1496

同被引文献626

引证文献39

二级引证文献241

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部