期刊文献+

基于GIS的东苕溪典型小流域土壤侵蚀风险评估 被引量:11

Assessing Soil Erosion Potential Using GIS for A Typical Watershed in East-Tiaoxi Basin, China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于GIS信息平台,采用土壤流失评估模型(USLE)对东苕溪典型小流域的土壤侵蚀强度进行估算评价,识别了土壤流失关键源区。结果表明:东苕溪典型小流域土壤侵蚀量在时间上与降雨量有较好的相关性(r=0.730,P<0.05),侵蚀方式以水力侵蚀为主;年均土壤侵蚀模数为2347t·km-2,属轻度强度侵蚀,土壤侵蚀强度呈现南北两端高,中部地区低的趋势;不同土地利用类型土壤侵蚀强度差异显著,年均侵蚀模数城镇用地>农村生活用地>耕地>林地>园地;中度及强度侵蚀区主要发生在陡坡带及7°~12°的耕地,极强度及剧烈侵蚀区主要集中在坡度大于12°的耕地、城镇用地及农村用地。 Using a Geographic Information System(GIS)and the Universal Soil Loss Equation(USLE), we assessed the soil erosion potentials for a typical watershed in East-Tiaoxi basin. The results showed that there existed positive correlation between soil erosion and rainfall intensity (r=0.730,P〈0.05). Rainfall erosion was the main form of soil erosion in the watershed. The annual average soil erosion modulus amount- ed to 2 347 t·km-2, which fall into the category of mild-degree erosion. Besides the rainfall, the vegetation cover was important factor causing soil erosion. The erosion in the watershed was generally stronger in southern and northern part than that in the central. In terms of land use/ cover categories, the annual average soil erosion intensity was in sequence:urban〉rural〉cropland〉forest〉orchard. It was also indicated that human activities had great influence on soil erosion. In addition, slope was correlated with soil erosion modulus. The middle and high intensi- ty of erosion were found in steep slope zone and the cropland with the slope ranged from 7° to 12°. The intensive and extremely intensive ero- sion were found in the cropland, urban land and rural land with slope greater than 12°.
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期1777-1784,共8页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基金 浙江省科技厅环境规划研究团队建设项目(2012F20018)
关键词 GIS USLE 土壤侵蚀 风险评估 GIS; USLE; soil erosion; risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Chen T, Niu R Q, Li P X, et al. Regional soil erosion risk mapping using RUSLE, GIS, and remote sensing:A case study in Miyun Watershed, North China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, 63(3 ):533-541.
  • 2Sharma A, Tiwari K N, Bhadoria P B S. Effect of land use land cover change on soil erosion potential in an agricultural watershed[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assess merit, 2011, 173 ( 1-4 ) : 789-801.
  • 3赵磊,袁国林,张琰,贺彬,刘忠翰,王志芸,李靖.基于GIS和USLE模型对滇池宝象河流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(3):42-46. 被引量:47
  • 4Wang X, Hao F H, Cheng H G, et al. Estimating non-point source pollutant loads for the large-scale basin of the Yangtze River in China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, 63(5 ) : 1079-1092.
  • 5庞靖鹏,徐宗学,刘昌明,陈庆伟.基于GIS和USLE的非点源污染关键区识别[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(2):170-174. 被引量:19
  • 6Iroume A, Carey P, Bronstert A, et al. GIS application of USLE and MUSLE to estimate erosion and suspended sediment load in experimental catchments, Valdivia, Chile[J]. Revista Tecnica De La Facultad De Ingenieria Universidad Del Zulia, 2011, 34(2) : 119-128.
  • 7Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. RUSLE-revised universal soil loss equation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1991, 46 (1):30-33.
  • 8Morgan R P C. A simple approach to soil loss prediction:A revised Morgan-Morgan-Finney model[J]. Catena, 2001, 44(4) :305-322.
  • 9Yang Q, Zhao Z Y, Chow T L, et al. Using GIS and a digital elevation model to assess the effectiveness of variable grade flow diversion terraces in reducing soil erosion in northwestern New Brunswick, Canada [J]. Hydrological Processes, 2009, 23(23 ):3271-3280.
  • 10Mishra P K, Deng Z Q. Sediment TMDL development for the Amite River[J]. Water Resources Management, 2009, 23 (5) : 839-852.

二级参考文献159

共引文献1155

同被引文献175

引证文献11

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部