期刊文献+

两种椎体次全切手术方式治疗相邻节段颈椎病疗效比较

Comparative Study of Two Kinds of Corpectomy for the Treatment of Adjacent Two-level Cervical Spondylosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较保留椎体后壁与否的两种椎体次全切钛笼钛板内固定手术方式治疗相邻节段颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:行颈前路手术治疗的相邻节段颈椎病患者40例,依据手术方式分为不保留椎体后壁的椎体次全切钛笼钛板内固定组(A组)21例,保留椎体后壁的椎体次全切钛笼钛板内固定组(B组)19例。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、JOA评分、临床疗效、Cobb's角及椎间高度变化,并观察植骨融合情况。结果:所有患者均随访18个月以上,平均22个月。B组手术时间、出血量均大于A组,椎间高度及Cobb's角的丢失,A组大于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组临床疗效、JOA评分、并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后椎间高度及Cobb's角较术前均有提高(P<0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访时植骨融合率均为100%。结论:两种手术方式治疗相邻节段颈椎病均可获得可靠的临床疗效,保留椎体后壁的手术方式可减少术后椎间高度及Cobb's角的丢失,但操作相对复杂,手术时间长,术中出血量相对较多,术中如发现椎体后缘骨赘较多,难以操作,应及时更换手术方式。 Objective:To compare the outcome of corpectomy with titanium cage and plate fixation for two-level cervical spondylosis(CS)that keeping the posterior wall of the vertebral or not.Methods: A retrospective analysis on the anterior cervical surgery in 40 cases of two-level CS was conducted and the patients were divided into 2 groups according to different surgical mode.In Group A,21 cases did not keep the posterior wall of the vertebral and in Group B,19 cases kept the posterior wall of the vertebral.The operation time,blood loss,JOA scores,clinical outcomes,the height and Cobb’s angle of the fused segments,and bone fusion were compared between the 2 groups.Results: All the patients were followed up for at least 18 months with a mean time of 22 months.A longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss were seen in Group B as compared with Group A(P〈0.05),while a greater loss of the height and the Cobb’s angle of the fused segments were noted in Group A than Group B(P〈0.05).The clinical outcomes,JOA scores,and incidence of complication were not different in Group A and Group B(P〉0.05).The height and the Cobb’s angle of the fused segments were improved in both groups after surgeries without difference between the 2 groups(P〉0.05).The spinal fusion rate of the two groups were both 100% at the final follow-up.Conclusion: Both methods can obtain positive effect on adjacent two-level cervical spondylosis.Keeping the posterior wall of the vertebral can reduce the loss of the height and the Cobb’s angle of the fused segments,but the surgical procedures are relatively complex with longer time and more blood loss.When too much osteophyma is found during the surgery,it should promptly change decompression to corpectomy with no keeping the posterior wall of the vertebral.
出处 《浙江中西医结合杂志》 2012年第9期685-688,共4页 Zhejiang Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 颈椎病 椎体后壁 椎体次全切 融合 内固定 cervical spondylosis the posterior wall of vertebral corpectomy fusion fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1袁文,王新伟,陈德玉,张颖,张涛,徐盛明.保留椎体后壁的椎体次全切除扩大减压术[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(11):667-670. 被引量:38
  • 2张俊杰,袁文,张竞,王新伟.保留后壁的颈椎椎体次全切除术的生物力学研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(5):377-379. 被引量:12
  • 3并上骏一.腰腿疾患治疗成绩制定基准[J].日整会志,1984,58:925-925.
  • 4王新伟,陈德玉,贾连顺,袁文,宋滇文,肖剑.颈前路减压植骨融合器械的设计及临床应用[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2003,18(8):505-507. 被引量:8
  • 5Petkov A, Eftimov T, Hadzhianglov I, et al. Surgical treat- ment in cervical spondylosis [J]. Khirurgiia (Sofiia), 2008, (3): 36-40.
  • 6周盛源,张立岩,王济纬,魏尧森,陈日勇,徐建军.颈前路钛板加钛网固定术后早期稳定性的观察[J].实用骨科杂志,2007,13(3):129-131. 被引量:4
  • 7Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, et al. Cervical surgi- cal techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic my- elopathy[J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2009,11 (2): 130-141.
  • 8Chang SW, Kakarla UK, Maughan PH, et al. Four-level ante- rior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: radio- graphic and clinical results [J]. Neurosurgery, 2010,66 (4): 639-646.
  • 9Rihn JA, Lawrence J, Gates C, et al. Adjacent segment dis- ease after cervical spine fusion[J]. Instr Course Lect, 2009, 58 : 747-756.
  • 10Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-lev- el intradiscal pressure and segmental motion [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2002,27 (22) : 2431-2434.

二级参考文献21

  • 1徐建伟,陈德玉,贾连顺.颈前路椎体次全切钛网植骨钛网裁切技术探讨[J].脊柱外科杂志,2003,1(5):257-259. 被引量:9
  • 2吕碧涛,袁文,王新伟,张竞,徐蕾.钛质外科网和自体髂骨块在颈椎前路减压融合术中应用的对比性研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(7):399-402. 被引量:25
  • 3郭永飞,陈德玉,徐建伟,王新伟,王良意,何志敏,陈宇,袁文,贾连顺.颈前路钛网植骨融合术后钛网沉陷的原因分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(7):409-413. 被引量:43
  • 4袁文,贾连顺,戴力扬,包聚良,李家顺.AO纯钛带锁钢板在颈椎前路固定的初步报告[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1996,6(4):161-163. 被引量:86
  • 5Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervicaldisks. J Neurosurg, 1958, 15: 602-617.
  • 6Smith G, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine dis-orders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbodyfusion. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1958, 40: 607-624.
  • 7Saunders RL, Bernini PM, Shirreffs TG Jr, et al. Central corpectomyfor cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a consecutive series with long-term follow-up evaluation. J Neurosurg, 1991, 74: 163-170.
  • 8Bohlman HH, Anderson PA. Anterior decompression and arthrodesisof the cervical spine: long-term motor improvement. Part Ⅰ . Im-provement in incomplete traumatic quadriparesis. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1992, 74: 671-682.
  • 9Groff MW, Sriharan S, Lee SM, et al. Partial corpectomy for cervicalspondylosis. Spine, 2003, 28: 14-20.
  • 10Epstein NE,Dickerman RD.Delayed iliac crest autograft fractures following plated single-level anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2002,15(5):420-424.

共引文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部