期刊文献+

创新型企业债务结构与成长性的关系研究——基于沪深上市企业的实证检验 被引量:19

Study on the Relationship between Debt Structure and Growth of Innovative Enterprises——An Empirical Analysis Based on Listed Companies in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于2008~2010年沪深上市创新型企业的经验数据,以因子分析法所计算的企业成长性综合指数来衡量创新型企业成长性,运用平衡面板数据固定效应模型,实证分析债务结构(债务比例、债务期限、债务来源)对创新型企业成长性的影响。研究结果表明:债务比例、短期债务、商业信用及银行借款均与企业成长性显著负相关;而长期债务与企业成长性显著正相关。创新型企业债务结构的不平衡与不合理,是导致债务融资对企业成长性产生整体消极效应的主要原因。 Based on the 2008 - 2010 empirical data of listed innovative enterprises in China, by applying factor analysis, this paper measures innovative enterprises growth with the comprehensive index of enterprises growth. And by applying fixed effects model of balanced panel data, this paper analyzes the relationship between the debt structure( debt propor- tion, debt maturity, debt source)and growth of innovative enterprises. The results show that there exists a significantly negative relationship between debt proportion, short-term debt, commercial credit, bank loan and enterprises growth, and a significantly positive relationship between long-term debt and enterprises growth. The unbalanced and unreasoned debt structure of innovative enterprises is the main reason which results that debt financing have the overall negative effects to enterprises growth.
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期34-39,46,共7页 Forecasting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70873095) 教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(07JA630067) 山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究资助项目(2010222)
关键词 创新型企业 债务结构 成长性 innovative enterprises debt structure growth
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1中国创新型企业发展报告编委会.中国创新型企业发展报告(2010)[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2010.
  • 2伊迪丝·彭罗斯.企业成长理论[M].赵晓译.上海:格致出版社,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,2007.
  • 3Frank M Z, Goyal V K. Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure[ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003, 67: 217-248.
  • 4Booth L, Aivazian V, Demirguc-Kunt A, et al.. Capital structure in developing countries[ J]. Journal of Finance, 2001, 56: 87-130.
  • 5Serrasqueiro Z, Nunes P M. Non-linear relationships between growth opportunities and debt: evidence from quoted portuguese companies [ J ]. Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63 : 870-878.
  • 6Chang C F, Alice C L, Cheng F L. Determinants of cap- ital structure choice: a structure equation modeling approach[ J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2009, 49: 197-213.
  • 7Guedes J, Opler T. The determinants of the maturity of corporate debt Issues[ J]. Journal of Finance, 1996, 51 : 1809-1833.
  • 8Datta S, Iskandar-Datta M, Raman K. Managerial stock ownership and the maturity structure of corporate debt [ J]. Journal of Finance, 2005, 60: 2333-2350.
  • 9Anderson C W, Makhija A K. Deregulation, disintermedia- tion, and agency costs of debt: evidence from Japan [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 51 : 309-339.
  • 10O' Brien J, David P. Firm growth and type of debt: the paradox of discretion [ J ]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2009, 19: 51-80.

二级参考文献104

同被引文献178

引证文献19

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部