期刊文献+

B超引导下臂丛神经阻滞麻醉的临床效果分析 被引量:16

Clinical Analysisof B Ultrasound-guided Brachial Plexus Anesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨B超引导下臂丛神经阻滞麻醉用于上肢手术的麻醉效果及安全性。方法选取我院骨科120例拟行上肢手术患者,随机分为2组,A组采用臂丛神经阻滞盲探式操作,B组采用B超引导下的臂丛神经阻滞,两组均采用1%利多卡因+0.25%布比卡因合剂。结果 A组与B组相比,麻醉效果及安全性存在明显差异:A组麻醉效果优良率为83.3%。B组麻醉效果优良率为93.3%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。麻醉过程中患者发生寒战、惊厥发生率及血管神经损伤、止血带反应等不良反应率B组明显少于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 B超引导下臂丛神经阻滞运用于较长时间的上肢手术是更为合适,提高了穿刺、置管成功率,增加了麻醉效果的优良率,减少了并发症的发生率。 Objective To observe the safety and efficacy of B uItrasound-guided brachiaI pIexus bIock anesthesia in upper Iimb operation.Methods 120 patients in our hospital undergoing upper Iimb operation with bracheaI pIexus bIock anesthesia were divided into two groups(60 cases each group).Group A use Brachial plexus block blind operation.Group B use B ultrasound-guided Brachial plexus anesthesia.The anesthetics were 1% Iidocaine mixed with 0.25%bupivacaine.Results Significant difference in group A compared to group B,the anesthetic effect and safety: A group of excellent and good rate was 83.3%,but the Group B anesthesia excellent rate was 93.3%,group B,the difference was statistically significance(P0.05).Conclusion B ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block used in a long time the upper extremity surgery is more appropriate to improve the puncture catheter success rate,an increase of the anesthetic effect of the fine rate,reducing the incidence of complications.
机构地区 武汉市第五医院
出处 《中国医药指南》 2012年第25期34-36,共3页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 B超引导 臂丛神经阻滞 上肢手术 B ultrasound-guided Brachial plexus block Upper extremity surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1朱波,杨亦斌,王寿根,沈跃.神经刺激器定位臂丛神经在锁骨手术中的应用[J].浙江实用医学,2005,10(2):108-108. 被引量:4
  • 2唐延先,周宏.周围神经刺激器在闭孔神经阻滞中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(11):791-791. 被引量:3
  • 3蒋学斌,徐旭仲,吴道珠,李挺,黄品同,余微萍.超声引导喙突径路锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(19):1355-1357. 被引量:17
  • 4Auroy Y, benhamou D, Bargues L, et al. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service[J].Anesthesiology, 2002,97 (5):1274-1280.
  • 5Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultersound guidance in regional anaesthesia[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2005,94(1):7-17.
  • 6Merle JC, Mazoit JX, Desgranges P, et al. A comparison of two technique for cervical plexus blockade: evaluation of efficacy and systemic toxicity[J]. Anesth Analg,1999,89 (6):1366-1370.
  • 7Carler M,Pulcini A,Macchi P,et al.An evaluation of the brachial plexus block at the humeral canal using a neurostimulator( 1417 patients) :the efficacy, safety ,and predictive criteria of failure[J]. Anesth Analg, 2001,92(1):194-198.
  • 8Perris TM, Watt JM. The road to success: a review of 1000 axillary brachial plexus blocks [J]. Anaesthesia,2003,58(12):1220-1224.
  • 9Franco CD, Vieira ZE. 1001 subclavian pefivascular brachial plexus blocks:success with a nerve stimulator[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2000,25(1):41-46.
  • 10Sandhu NS, Capan LM. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block [J]. Br J Aneaesth,2002,89(2):254-259.

共引文献139

同被引文献90

引证文献16

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部