期刊文献+

中国电子信息行业上市公司董事结构与公司绩效的实证研究 被引量:1

An Empirical Analysis on the Structure of Board of Director and the Performance Evaluation of Listed Companies of Electronic Information Industry in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从四个维度出发,在特定法律规范约束下,引入绝对合理独立董事人数概念,对2010年中国电子信息业171家上市公司董事会结构和企业绩效的关系进行了研究,结果显示:中国电子信息产业上市公司董事会规模大的企业绩效优于规模小的企业,规模较小时企业绩效不稳定;企业绩效并不直接取决于独立董事占董事会的比重,而与独立董事超过绝对合规独立董事人的比例有关;由于职业经理人市场不完善,董事长与总经理两职合一的企业绩效优于两职分离的企业;对董事会适当的股权激励将增加董事工作的积极性。 Under certain legal norm constraints, this paper, from four dimensions and with the introduction of the concept of absolute compliance independent directors number, analyzes the relationship between the structure of board of director and the performance evaluation based on data from 171 Chinese listed companies of electronic information industry in 2010. The results of statistics and regression reveal these: companies with big board of director always show better performance evaluation than companies with small board of director; small board companies always have unstable performance evaluation; the performance evaluation of a company is not directly decided by the proportion of independent directors in the board of directors, but is correlated with the proportion of independent directors that exceed the compliance independent directors; because of the imperfect market of professional managers, the performance evaluation of the enterprises with a combined position of CEO and the chairman of BOD is better than that with separated positions, and more companies would like to take the separated structure; equity incentive of board of directors shows proactive impact on the performance evaluation.
作者 王华 梁峰
出处 《统计与信息论坛》 CSSCI 2012年第9期63-68,共6页 Journal of Statistics and Information
关键词 董事会结构 绩效 独立董事 电子信息行业 structure of board of director performance evaluation independent director electronic information industry
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Denis D K, McConnell J J. International Corporate Governance[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2003,38(5).
  • 2Gillan S L. Recent Developments in Corporate Governance: An OverviewrJ-]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2006(3).
  • 3Yermack D. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996,40(2).
  • 4Eisenberg T, Sundgren S, Wells M T. Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998,48(1).
  • 5Sanda A, Mikailu A S, Garba T. Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm Financial Performance in Nigeria[R]. Nairobi: AERC Research Paper 149,2005.
  • 6Bhagat S, Black B. The Non--Correlation between Board Independence and Long--Term Firm Performance[J]. Journal ofCorporation Law, 2002,27(2).
  • 7Coles J L, Daniel N D, Naveen L. Boards. Does One Size Ht All[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2008,87(2).
  • 8李维安,邱艾超.公司治理研究的新进展:国际趋势与中国模式[J].南开经济评论,20lO,13(6).
  • 9王晨光,孔丽花.关于旅游企业公司治理与绩效的实证研究[J].山东社会科学,2009(9):73-76. 被引量:9
  • 10Vance S C. Boards of Directors: Structure and Performance[M]. Eugene, OR:University of Oregon Press, 1964.

二级参考文献65

共引文献989

同被引文献18

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部