摘要
我国的法律对既判力未做规定,在司法实践中,一般的实务工作者认为判决的既判力仍然存在,且其范围仅及于判决主文。不过由于缺乏法律的直接规定,实务工作者不能直接适用既判力处理前诉判决之效力问题,实务工作者可以据为判决的依据仅是判决的预决效力之规定。为此,必须对我国判决的预决效力进行分析,并在借鉴两大法系之通用的判决效力理论重构我国的判决预决效力制度。
China's law on resjudicata did not make a provision, in judicial practice, the general practitioners think sentences adjudged force still exist, and only relates to the text of the judgment. Therefore, we must analysize our judgment anticipation effect, with the two big legal systems of criminal judgment theories, to reconstruct our judgment anticipation validity system.
出处
《山东青年政治学院学报》
2012年第5期90-94,共5页
Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science
关键词
辩论主义
既判力
争点效
预决效力
doctrine of debate
resjudicata
issue preclusion validity
pre - definitive effectiveness