期刊文献+

会计师事务所规模与审计定价——基于中国本土事务所的经验研究 被引量:13

CPA Firm Size and Audit Fee: Evidence from Chinese Local CPA Firms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 会计师事务所规模与审计收费之间的关系取决于产品差异化、声誉投资、市场势力等三个因素与规模效应之间何者相对占优。对我国A股上市公司2007~2008年数据检验发现,无论是以业务收入、注册会计师人数还是从业人员人数度量事务所规模,事务所规模与审计收费之间都呈显著的正向关系。这表明,大事务所可以收取更高的审计费用。同时,在我国审计市场,规模效应相对于其他三个因素可能不占优势。 The relationship between CPA firm size and audit fee is determined by which one being the best among the following four: product diversity, reputation investment, market power and scale effect. The empirical analysis has been done by the data from A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2008. The results show that there is a positive relationship between CPA firm size and audit fee, no matter the firm size is defined by revenue, or by CPA number or by employee number. It means that higher audit fee can be charged when the firm is bigger. Moreover, in Chi- nese market, firm scale has no advantage compared with the other three factors.
出处 《财经理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期69-75,共7页 The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71072043) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC790124) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目(2010ZDIXM025)
关键词 会计师事务所 规模 审计费用 规模效应 The CPA Firm Size Audit Fee Scale Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Simunic, D. A. The pricing of audit services., theory and evi- dence [J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1980, 18(1):161 -190.
  • 2Francis, J. R. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: a study of the australian market [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1984, 6 (2): 133-151.
  • 3Francis, J. R. , and D. J Stokes. Audit prices, product differ- entiation, and scale economies: further evidence from the aus- tralian market [J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1986, 24 (2) : 383-393.
  • 4Francis, J. R. , and D. T. Simon. A test of audit pricing in the small--client segment of the U. S. audit market [J]. The Ac-counting Review, 1987, 62 (1): 145-157.
  • 5Beatty, R. P. The economic determinants of auditor compensa- tion in the initial public offerings market [J]. Journai of Ac- counting Research, 1993, 31(2): 294-302.
  • 6Palmrose, Z. V. Audit fees and auditor size: further evidence [J].Journal of Accounting Research, 1986, 24(1) : 97-110.
  • 7刘斌,叶建中,廖莹毅.我国上市公司审计收费影响因素的实证研究——深沪市2001年报的经验证据[J].审计研究,2003(1):44-47. 被引量:256
  • 8漆江娜,陈慧霖,张阳.事务所规模·品牌·价格与审计质量——国际“四大”中国审计市场收费与质量研究[J].审计研究,2004(3):59-65. 被引量:341
  • 9吕兆德,宋常.关于会计师事务所规模溢价的研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2007,29(12):113-119. 被引量:6
  • 10DeAngelo, L. Auditor size and audit quality [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1981, 3(3): 183-199.

二级参考文献39

  • 1张立民,管劲松.我国A股审计市场的结构研究——来自2002上市公司年度报告的数据[J].审计研究,2004(5):31-36. 被引量:48
  • 2周红.“四大”的国际地位和中国审计市场结构优化[J].会计研究,2005(3):70-75. 被引量:35
  • 3吕兆德,朱星文,宗文龙.民间审计地域特征研究——来自中国A股市场的证据[J].统计研究,2007,24(1):40-46. 被引量:19
  • 4Ayoib, C, and Keith A. Houghton, Audit Fee Premiums of Big Eight Firms: Evidence from the Market for Medium - Size U.
  • 5K Auditees, Journal of International Accounting & Taxation, Vo. 5,1996.
  • 6Beatty, R, Auditor Reputation and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings, The Accounting Review, October, 1989.
  • 7Becker, C and M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management, Contemporary Accounting Research, Spring 1998.
  • 8Craswell, A and J R Francis, S L Taylor, Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations, Journal of Accounting and Economics 20,1995.
  • 9DeAngelo, L, Auditor Size and Audit Quality, Journal of Accounting and Economics 3,1981DeFond M and J Jiambalvo, Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors, Accounting Review July 1991.
  • 10DeFond M and J Jiambalvo,Factors Related to Auditor- Client Disagreements over Income - Increasing Accounting Methods, Contemporary Accounting Research, Spring 1993.

共引文献547

同被引文献215

引证文献13

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部