期刊文献+

语言人类学中的结构与能动 被引量:3

Structure and Agency in Linguistic Anthropology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在把语言当作文化资源和文化实践的语言人类学中,语言就是一种行动的方式,人们用语言做事情。语言还能反映群体和个人的分类方式和思维特征,反映他们的情感和价值观。一方面,语言作为历史的沉淀,折射社会文化结构,并具备自身的结构,能够指导和影响人们的思维和行动。另一方面,语言在被运用的实践过程中,群体和个人的力量又构成能动性,反过来对语言结构形成冲击,甚至改变语言。事实上,结构与能动并不能截然分开,而是一种互动的关系。 In linguistic anthropology, language is taken as cultural resources and cultural practice. As such, language is a mode of ac- tion, that is, people use language to do things. Language also reflects modes of classification, thinking features, emotions, and values of individuals and groups. On the one hand, language, as historical sediments with its own structure, reflects the structure of society and culture, guiding and influencing people's thinking and actions. On the other hand, individuals and groups also perform agency when using language in practice. The power of agency can form an impact on language structure, and even lead to some transformation of language. In fact, structure and agency cannot be clearly divided, instead, they are interactional.
作者 连煦
出处 《云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期36-41,共6页 Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 语言人类学 结构 能动 linguistic anthropology structure agency
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Duranti,Alessandro.Linguistic Anthropology[M].Bei-jing:Peking University Press.2002.
  • 2纳日碧力戈.语言人类学阐释[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,30(4):30-35. 被引量:14
  • 3Ahearn,Laura.Language and Agency.Annual Review ofAnthropology,2001.30.
  • 4Garrett,P&Baquedano-Lopez,P.Language Socializa-tion:Reproduction and Continuity,Transformation andChange[M].Annual Review of Anthropology,2002.31.
  • 5Hill,J&Mannheim,B.Language and World View[J].Annual Review of Anthropology,1992.21.
  • 6Eisenstadt,S.N.Functional Analysis in Anthropology andSociology:An Interpretative Essay[M].Annual Reviewof Anthropology,1990.19.
  • 7Arensberg,Conrad.Culture As Behavior:Structure and E-mergence[M].Annual Review of Anthropology,1972,(1).
  • 8Johnstone,Barbara.The Individual Voice in Language[J].Annual Review of Anthropology,2000.29.
  • 9Blommaert,J&Bulcaen,C.Critical Discourse Analysis[J].Annual Review of Anthropology,2000.29:p 448.
  • 10Hanks,W.F.Text and Textuality[J].Annual Reviewof Anthropology,1989,18.

二级参考文献1

  • 1(美)保罗·唐纳顿著,纳日碧力戈.社会如何记忆[M]上海人民出版社,2001.

共引文献13

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部