期刊文献+

论国有船舶的有限管辖豁免 被引量:1

On the restrictive jurisdictional immunity with respect to state-owned ships
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国有船舶管辖豁免经历了从绝对豁免到限制豁免的发展历程。20世纪初以来,国际社会开始通过国内立法、司法判例、国际条约等实践将用于商业目的的国有船舶排除在管辖豁免的范围之外。但在对国有船舶豁免范围予以限制的同时,应当注意明晰以下三个问题:用于商业目的的国有船舶应当依据船舶的用途来界定;国有企业对于所经营的国有船舶不得主张管辖豁免;国有企业具有独立的法人资格,一国法院不得任意扣押与当事船舶无关的其他国有企业的船舶。 The jurisdictional immunity of state-owned ships has evolved from absolute immunity to restrictive immunity. Since the beginning of the 20th century, the international community gradually denied the immunity of state-owned ships used for commercial purposes through state practice such as domestic legislations, domestic judicial decisions and international treaties. Meanwhile, as the scope of immunity with respect to state-owned ships is limited to state-owned ships used for non-commercial purposes, it is necessary to make clear the following three questions: state-owned ship used for commercial purposes shall be defined according to its usage~ state enterprises have no right to invoke jurisdictional immunity relating to the operation of state-owned ships ; since state enterprises have independent legal personalities, it is not allowed to arrest any irrelevant ships operated by other state enterprises other than the particular ship in respect of which the claim arose.
作者 徐树
机构地区 清华大学法学院
出处 《中国海商法研究》 CSSCI 2012年第2期46-53,69,共9页 Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
关键词 国有船舶 管辖豁免 限制豁免 国有企业 船舶扣押 state-owned ships jurisdictional immunity restrictive immunity state enterprises arrest of ships
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1MCNAIR A D. Judicial recognition of states and governments and the immunity of public ships[J].British Yearbook of International Law,1921,(02):57-74.
  • 2SUCHARITKUL S. Immunities of foreign states before national authorities[J].Recueil des Cours,1976,(149):107.
  • 3BANKAS E K. The state immunity controversy in international law:private suits against sovereign states in domestic courts[M].New York:springer-verlag,2005.14-21.
  • 4MALANCZUK P. Akehurst''''s modern introduction to international law[M].Florence:Routledge,1997.118-119.
  • 5傅廷中.海商法论[M]北京:法律出版社,2007.
  • 6YIANNOPOULOS A N. Foreign sovereign immunity and the arrest of state-owned ships:the need for an admiralty foreign sovereign immunity act[J].Tulane Law Review,1982,(57):1288-1289.
  • 7DICKINSON E D. The immunity of public ships employed in trade[J].American Journal of International Law,1927,(21):108-111.
  • 8陆川.国家出资企业不应包括国家参股企业[J].法学,2008(6):87-89. 被引量:2
  • 9何志鹏.对国家豁免的规范审视与理论反思[J].法学家,2005(2):108-117. 被引量:21
  • 10张露藜.论国家豁免中商业交易的认定[J].现代法学,2006,28(2):150-156. 被引量:4

二级参考文献83

共引文献25

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部