期刊文献+

利用新型可渗透反应格栅技术对垃圾渗滤液污染地下水过程作用研究 被引量:3

The remediation of leachate-polluted groundwater with permeable reactive barrier technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以垃圾渗滤液污染地下水为研究对象,选择沸石、无烟煤、陶粒、活性炭、炉渣、粉煤灰、零价铁、石英砂作为填充材料,设计7种地下可渗透反应格栅(PRB),分别为反应器1、2、3、4、5、6和7。通过连续实验模拟,对PRB技术治理污染地下水的可行性和有效性进行研究,监测反应器处理效果,分别7种反应器内流速、EC、Cl-的变化及对污染物去除效果及其影响进行分析,探索污染物去除机理。结果显示,反应器水渗流速度在80-150 cm.d-1情况下,对COD去除率为82.22%-88.88%,对Cl-去除率为-0.20%-1.68%,对色度去除率为36.38%-71.86%,表明利用新型PRB技术防控渗滤液污染地下水是可行的,但仍有些技术问题有待深入研究。 In this paper seven reaction media zero valent iron (ZVI), activated carbon, zeolites, ceramsite, slag, anthracite, flyash were used to design seven kinds of permeable reactive barrier (PRB), viz. reactors 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. The feasibility and the efficiency of the PRB technology in the remediation of leachate-polluted groundwater were studied by successive experimental simulation. The removal effects to the pollutant of the reactors along with the variation of flow velocity,EC and C1- were analysed to explore the removal mechanism. The results indicated that the COD, CI and chroma removal ratios were from 82.22%-88.11%, 89.31%-93.65%, and 36.38%-71.86% respectively in case that the seepage velocity were from 80-150 cm.d-1. It can be indicated that PRB technology is an efficient method for the treatment of leachate-contaminated groundwater, though it is expected to do further research.
出处 《生态环境学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第8期1457-1461,共5页 Ecology and Environmental Sciences
基金 中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所基本科研业务费专项经费资助(SK200902) 中国地质调查局西北地区主要城市地下水污染调查评价(G201106)
关键词 可渗透反应墙(PRB) 垃圾渗滤液 地下水 填充材料 原位处理 permeable reactive barrier (PRB) leachate ground water filling materials in-situ remediation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1CHRISTONSEN T H, KJELDSEN P, BJERG P L, et al. Biogeochemistry of landfill leachate plumes [J]. Appl. Geochem, 2001, 16(7/8): 659-718.
  • 2EHRIG H J. Quality and quatity of sanitary landfill leachate [J]. Waste Manag Res, 1983, 1(1): 53-68.
  • 3MACFARLANE D, CHERRY J, GILLHAM R, et al. Migration of contaminants in groundwater at a landfill: A casestudy-1. Groundwater flow and plume delineation [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1983, 63(1/2): 1-29.
  • 4KJELDSEN E Groundwater pollution source characterization of an old landfill [J]. J. Hydrol, 1993, 142(1/4): 349-371,.
  • 5KJELDSEN P, BJERG P L, RUGGE K, et al. Characterization of an old municipal landfill (Grindsted, Denmark) as a groundwater pollution sorce: landfill hydrology and leachate migration [J]. Waste manag Res, 1998, 16(1): 14-22.
  • 6GILLHAM R W, O'HANNESIN S F. Enhanced degradation of halogenated aliphatics by zero-valent iron [J]. Ground Water, 1994, 32(6): 958-967.
  • 7BLOWES D W, PTACEK C J, CHERRY J A, et al. Passive remediation of groundwater using in situ treatment curtains [M]. Geocnvironment 2000, Geotechnical Special publication, ASCE, 1995(46): 1588-1607.
  • 8HARALD B. General Overview. NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technolo-gies for the Treatment of Contaminated Land and Groundwa-ter (PhaseⅢ), 1998, 229: 1-2.
  • 9CANTRELL K J, KAPLAN D I, WIETSMA T W. Zerovalent iron for the in situ remediation of selected metals in groundwater [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1995, 42: 201-212.
  • 10BILL M, BARTH J A C, SLATER G F, et al. Carbon isotope fractionation during reductive dechlorination of TCE in batch experiments with iron samples from reactive barriers [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2003, 66: 25-37.

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部