期刊文献+

护理干预对腹部手术患者麻醉前后留置导尿管舒适度的影响 被引量:23

Influence of Nursing Intervention on Degree of Comfort of Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery before and after Anesthesia with Indwelling Catheter
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:目的:观察护理干预对腹部手术患者麻醉前后留置导尿管舒适度的影响。方法:将70例接受腹部手术治疗患者随机分为观察组、对照组各35例,麻醉前后留置导尿管。2组均于导尿管留置期间进行常规护理,观察组患者在导尿管留置期间给予认知干预、心理干预、置管护理干预、术后护理干预、环境干预等护理干预措施。结果:观察组疼痛程度明显低于对照组(P<0.05),舒适度明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组在手术进行过程中生命体征波动幅度明显小于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组护理满意度、手术成功率均明显高于对照组(P<0.05),并发症发生率小于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:认知干预、心理干预、置管护理干预、术后护理干预、环境干预等护理干预措施有助于降低腹部手术患者麻醉前后留置导尿管患者疼痛程度,提高舒适度,减少并发症。 Objective: To study influence of nursing intervention on degree of comfort in patients undergoing ab-dominal surgery with indwelling catheter before and after anesthesia. Method: Seventy patients were divided into ob- servation group and control group, 35 cases in each group, indwelling catheter before and after anesthesia. During the period of indwelling catheter both groups received conventional nursing, observation group received nursing interven- tion. Result: Degree of comfort in patients of observation group was obviously superior to that of control group after in- dwelling catheter; degree of pain during the period of indwelling catheter was remarkably lower than that of control group (P〈0.05); life fluctuation during the process of surgery of observation group were significantly less than that of control group, satisfactory rate and success rate of surgery were higher than that of control group(P〈0.05); numbers of patients with complication during the course of indwelling catheter were less than that of control group. Conclusion: Nursing intervention is helpful to reduce the pain of patients undergoing abdominal surgery with indwelling catheter before and after anesthesia, raise de^ree of comfort and decrease the onset of complication.
作者 于春宁
出处 《西部中医药》 2012年第9期106-108,共3页 Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词 导尿管 腹部手术 护理干预 麻醉 舒适度 catheter abdominal surgery nursing intervention anesthesia degree of comfort
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献23

  • 1曹德雄,曹林,叶西就,林道炜,赵一凡.焦虑对子宫切除和/或附件切除术病人硬膜外阻滞期间血液动力学的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(8):630-631. 被引量:8
  • 2Vinik HR, Reves JG, Wright D. Premedieation with intramuscular midazolam: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study. Anesth Analg, 1982,61 : 933-937.
  • 3Fan SZ, Susetio L, Wang YP, et al. Low dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with epidural lidocaine for cesarean section: a balance block technique. Anesth Analg, 1994,78 : 474-477.
  • 4Rawal N, Schollin J, Wesstrom G. Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1988,32 : 61-66.
  • 5吴多志 周德华.剖宫产围术期输入中分子羟乙基淀粉对胎儿血气的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2000,20(12):729-729.
  • 6陈志新 方志源.脊麻硬膜外复合麻醉用于剖腹产时脊麻布比卡因剂量的探讨[J].临床麻醉学杂志,1999,15:47-47.
  • 7崔焱.基础护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.284-287.
  • 8Schiotz HA. Antiseptic catheter gel and urinary tract infection after shortterm postoperative catheterization in women. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 1996,258(2)t 97-100.
  • 9Wiley Mj, Tran TA. Perioperative urinary eatheterization in conjunction with epidural anaesthesia for hip and knee arthroplasty. Is it safe?. Int J Surg Investig. 1999,1(2):157-160.
  • 10Lifschitz R, Jedeirin R. Spinal epidural anesthesia[J]. Anaesthesia,1992,47:503.

共引文献204

同被引文献97

引证文献23

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部