期刊文献+

改良Possum评分系统对胸外科术后患者并发症及手术死亡的预测价值 被引量:8

Value of Modified Possum Scoring System in Predicting Complications and Death after Thoracic Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良Possum评分系统对胸外科术后患者并发症及手术死亡的预测价值。方法选取2002年1月—2004年4月河北医科大学第四医院胸外科住院行手术治疗的患者1 287例为研究对象,进行Possum评分。将手术时间纳入Possum评分系统中,采用Logistic回归方法建立回归方程,建立改良Possum(T-Possum)评分系统。同时比较Possum评分和T-Possum评分对胸外科术后患者并发症和手术死亡的预测结果。结果共有511例患者术后发生并发症,手术死亡18例。Logistic回归方法建立T-Possum评分方程为:ln〔R1/(1-R1)〕=-6.18+(0.24×生理学得分)+(0.15×手术侵袭度得分);ln〔R2/(1-R2)〕=-7.92+(0.15×生理学得分)+(0.13×手术侵袭度得分),其中R1为术后并发症发生概率,R2为手术死亡发生概率。Possum评分和T-Possum评分对胸外科术后并发症的预测值与实际值比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.4059,P=0.1105)。Possum评分和T-Possum评分对胸外科手术死亡的预测值与实际值比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=84.8554,P=0.0000);其中Possum评分预测值与T-Pos-sum评分预测值比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=46.7987,P=0.000);Possum评分预测值与实际值比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=53.9175,P=0.0000);T-Possum评分预测值与实际值比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.4063,P=0.5238)。结论 T-Possum评分在预测手术死亡方面优于Possum评分,与实际值更接近,可用于预测胸外科手术患者术后并发症和手术死亡。 Objectives To Assess the value of modified Possum scoring system in predicting complications and death after thoracic surgery. Methods Possum scoring was carried out in 1 287 patients receiving thoracic surgery from January 2002 to April 2004. Operation time was fitted into Possum scoring system, Logistic regression method used to establish regression e- quation and then T - Possum scoring system. The predicting results of complications and death after operation were compared be- tween systems Possum and T - Possum. Results A total of 511 patients had post - operative complications, 18 died. T - Pos- sum scoring equation: In [ R1/ ( 1 - R1 ) ] = - 6. 18 + (0.24 x physiological scores) + (0. 15 x degree of surgical inva- sion) ; In [ R2/ ( 1 - R2 ) ] = -7. 92 + (0. 15 x physiological scores) + (0. 13 x degree of surgical invasion), thereinto R1 stood for happening probability of complications, R2 for that of death. No significant difference was noted in complication predic- tion and actual value between systems Possum and T- Possum (X2 = 4. 4059, P = 0. 1105 ) , but there was in death prediction and actual value (X2 = 84. 8554, P = 0. 0000). There was not difference between Possum score and actual value (X2 = 53. 9175, P = 0. 0000), or between T - Possum score and actual value ( X2 = 0. 4063, P = 0. 5238 ). Conclusion T - POS- SUM Scoring System is suitable to predict morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第26期3074-3076,共3页 Chinese General Practice
基金 河北省卫生厅科技攻关课题(04153) 河北省普通高等学校强势特色学科肿瘤学建设经费资助项目(冀教高[2005]52号)
关键词 胸外科 手术并发症 手术时间 死亡 Thoracic surgery Postoperative complications Operating time Death
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Copeland GP, Jones D, Waiters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit [J]. Sr J Surg, 1991, 78 (3): 355 - 360.
  • 2杨立伟,白世祥,孟宪利,何明,刘庆熠,陈新.脉冲振荡肺功能检测与食管癌贲门癌术后呼吸系统并发症的关系[J].第三军医大学学报,2006,28(15):1598-1600. 被引量:3
  • 3Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, et al. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and opera- tive severity score for the enUmeration of mor-tality and morbidity [J]. Br J Surg, 1998, 85 (9): 1217-1220.
  • 4Prutherch DR, Sutton GL, Boyle JR. Ports- mouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery [J]. BrJ Surg, 2001, 88 (7) : 958 -963.
  • 5Sah BK, Zhu ZG, Chen MM, et al. Effect of surgical work volume on postoperative com- plication: superiority of specialized center in gastric cancer treatment [ J ]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2009, 394 (1): 41-47.
  • 6Zafirellis KD, Fountoulakis A, Dolan K, et al. Evaluation of POSSUM in patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing resection [ J ]. BrJSurg, 2002, 89 (9): 1150-1155.
  • 7Tekkis PP, McCulloch P, Poloniecki JD, et al. Risk - adjusted prediction of operative mortalityin oesophagogastric surgery with OPOSSUM [J]. SrJSurg, 2004, 91 (3): 288 - 295.
  • 8杨立伟,白世祥,孟宪利,何明,刘庆熠,陈新.POSSUM评分预测胸外科高龄患者术后并发症发生率和死亡率的价值[J].解放军医学杂志,2006,31(2):150-151. 被引量:2
  • 9石应康 主译.胸心外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.221-233.
  • 10Koshy M, Esiashvilli N, Landry JC, et al. Muhiple management modalities in esophageal cancer: epidemiology, presentation and pro- gression, work - up, and surgical approa- ches [J]. Oncologist, 2004, 9 (2): 137 - 146.

二级参考文献20

  • 1聂弘.食管癌、贲门癌术后发生肺部并发症的高危因素分析[J].解剖与临床,2004,9(3):166-168. 被引量:4
  • 2秦茵茵,郑劲平,李建国.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者脉冲振荡法与常规肺通气功能测定的比较[J].广东医学,2005,26(1):69-70. 被引量:3
  • 3Copeland GP,Sagar P,Brennan J et al.Risk-adjusted analysis of surgeon performance:a 1-year study.Br J Surg,1995,82(3):408
  • 4Nygren J,Hausel J,Kehlet H et al.A comparison in five European Centres of case mix,clinical management and outcomes following either conventional or fast-track perioperative care in colorectal surgery.Clin Nutr,2005,24(3):455
  • 5Prytherch DR,Sutton GL,Boyle JR.Portsmouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.Br J Surg,2001,88(7):958
  • 6Poon JT,Chan B,Law WL.Evaluation of P-POSSUM in surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer and correlation of the predicted mortality with different surgical options.Dis Colon Rectum,2005,48(3):493
  • 7Whiteley MS,Prytherch DR,Higgins B et al.An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system.Br J Surg,1996,83 (6):812
  • 8石应康主译.胸心外科学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.19-20
  • 9邵中夫.食管重建术后并发症的防治.邵令方,王其彰,主编.新编食管外科学.石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,2002.668-673.
  • 10FERGUSON M K,DURKIN A E.Preoperative prediction of the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for cancer[J].J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2002,123 (4):661 -669.

共引文献30

同被引文献96

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部