摘要
近代以来,关于清代乾嘉考据学派的研究,有所谓"吴派"、"皖派"和"扬州学派"的争议。江藩是乾嘉汉学的中坚人物,有人依据师承关系,称之为"吴派后劲";或据其自署地望,谓之"扬州学派精英";或溯源其祖籍,而归之于"皖派后学",故今日学界难置其位。因此,在讨论江氏归属哪一种学派时,不免产生"三派分立是否成立"的质疑。而这一质疑的深入,也会涉及到清代学术研究的其他问题。
In recent rears, the study on Qianjia textual research school in the Qing Dynasty has a socalled controversy about Wu School and Wan School and Yangzhou School. As the most important figure of Qianjia sinology in the Qing Dynasty, jiang Fan is considered "a descendant of Wu School" based on master-apprentice relationship, or "elite of Yangzhou School" based on the place where he lived, or "a descendant of Wan School" according to his ancestral home. Since it is difficult to arrange his academic position today, the suspicion that the separation of three schools doesn't hold water inevitably occurs when discussing to which school Jiang Fan belong. And the deepening of this suspicion will touch upon other issues of academic research in the Qing Dynasty.
出处
《黄山学院学报》
2012年第4期26-30,共5页
Journal of Huangshan University
基金
教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大课题(12JJD750016)
教育部人文社科规划基金项目(10YJA770060)
关键词
乾嘉学派
江藩
“三派分立”
“皖派”学风
Qianjia School
Jiang Fan
separation of three schools
style of study of Wan School