期刊文献+

用于证据评价的似然比模型 被引量:4

LR models for evidence evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文介绍了似然比(Likelihood Ratios,LR)如何能够用以衡量司法鉴定学证据的强度。解释了为什么司法鉴定界专家不能回答诸如"这是谁干的?"这样的终极问题,但可以给出证据强度的度量值。文章随后描述了近来开发的LR分析模型的概况,包括迄今尚未彻底解决的问题。 This paper describes how Likelihood Ratios (LRs) can be used to measure the strength of evidence in forensic science. It explains why forensic experts cannot answer ultimate questions such as: "Who did it?", but can instead provide measures of the strength of evidence. This is followed by a short state of the art overview of currently developed LR models including a description of problems that are not yet completely solved.
出处 《中国司法鉴定》 2012年第4期28-53,共26页 Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
关键词 似然比 证据强度 似然比模型 Lidelihood Ratio evaluation of evidence LR model
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1A FSP (2009), Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Science and Justice 49:161- 164.
  • 2Aitken CGG, Taroni F (2004) Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists, 2nd ed, Chichester: Wi- ley.
  • 3Aitken, C.G.G, and Lucy, D. (2004) Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data. Appl. Statist, 53 (4) : 109-122.
  • 4Aitken, C.G.G, Zadora, G. and Lucy, D. (2007) A two- level model for evidence evaluation. Journal of Forensic Sci- ence. 52 (2):412-419.
  • 5Allen R and Roberts P (2007) Special issue on the reference class problem, The international journal of evidence & proof 11 (4); 243-317.
  • 6Bayes T, Price, R (1763). An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chance. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Can- ton, M. A. and F. R. S. PhiLosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 53:370 - 418.
  • 7Beecham GW and Weir BS (2011), Confidence Interval of the Likelihood Ratio Associated with Mixed Stain DNA Evi- dence, Journal of Forensic Science 56 : 166-171.
  • 8Bolck A, Weyermann C, Dujourdy L, Esseiva P, van den Berg J (2009), Different likelihood ratio approaches to eval- uate the strength of evidence of MDMA tablets comparison, Forensic Science International 191 : 45-51.
  • 9Bolck A and Alberink I (2011) Variation in Likelihood Ra- tios for forensic evidence evaluation of XTC tablets compari- son, Journal of Chemometrics , 25:41-49 DOI: 10.1002/ eem.1361.
  • 10Bolck A and Brouwer-Stamouli A (in preparation) LRs formuhivariate categorical evidence, Bozza, S, Taroni, F, Marquis, R, and Schmittbuhl, M. (2008) Probabilistic e- valuation of handwriting evidence; Likelihood ratio for au- thorship. Appl. Statist. Part 3, 57:329-343.

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部