期刊文献+

固定费率与业绩报酬激励机制影响基金风险承担的比较研究 被引量:7

Comparative Research on the Impact of Fixed Fee Rate and Performance Pay Incentive Mechanism on Fund Risk Taking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在委托代理的框架下,从理论上研究了固定费率与业绩报酬激励机制对基金风险承担的影响,并分四种情况利用数值模拟的方法比较分析了基金承担风险的大小,发现费率参数的设计对基金承担风险的激励有着重要的作用。受限于中国基金市场中的数据,采用EGARCH模型实证研究了四种情况中的一种,即固定费率相同的情况下业绩报酬激励机制具有更大的风险承担激励,经验数据支持这个理论研究结论。最后,针对理论和实证研究结论,对中国基金激励机制的设计提出了几点建议。 Under the principal - agent framework, this paper theoretically studies the impact of fixed fee rate and perform-ance pay incentive mechanism on fund risk taking. It uses numerical simulation method to comparatively analyze fund risk taking by sub - four eases, and finds that the design of fee rate parameters plays an important role. Limited by the data in the China fund market, it uses EGARCH model to empirically study the one of four conditions that performance pay incen- tive mechanism has a greater risk - taking incentive than fixed fee rate incentive mechanism if they have an equal fixed fee rate, which is proved by the empirical findings. Finally, based on the theoretical and empirical findings, a few suggestions are made to design the fund incentive mechanism in China.
作者 彭耿
机构地区 吉首大学商学院
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期44-49,共6页 Soft Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(11CGL022)
关键词 固定费率 业绩报酬 激励机制 基金 风险承担 fixed fee rate performance pay incentive mechanism fund risk taking
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Stracca L Delegated Portfolio Management: A Survey of the Theoret- ical Literature [ R ]. European Central Bank, Working Paper No. 520,2005(9).
  • 2朱旭强,贝政新.固定费率与激励费基金管理费收取方式的比较研究[J].预测,2011,30(1):56-60. 被引量:6
  • 3Starks L T. Performance Incentive Fees:An Agency Theoretic Ap-proach[ J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1987 (22) :17 -32.
  • 4Grinblatt M, Titman S. Adverse Risk Incentive and the Design of Performance Based Contracts[ J]. Management Science, 1989(51 ) : 43 - 52.
  • 5Carpenter J N. Does Option Compensation Increase Managerial Risk Appetite.'? [ J ]. Journal of Finance,2000,55 (5) :2311 - 2331.
  • 6Das S R, Sundaram R K. Fee Speech : Signaling, Risk Sharing, and the Impact of Fee Structures on Investor Welfare [ J ]. Review of E- conomic Studies,2002,15 (5) : 1465 - 1497.
  • 7王明好,陈忠,蔡晓钰.费率结构对证券投资基金风险承担行为的影响研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(10):117-121. 被引量:16
  • 8倪苏云,肖辉,吴冲锋.证券投资基金的管理费率设计研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(1):25-29. 被引量:11
  • 9Hugonnier J, Kaniel R. Mutual Fund Portfolio Choice in the Pres- ence of Dynamic Flows [ R ]. HEC Montreal and CIRANO, Fuqua School of Business, Working Paper, 2004.
  • 10Ross S. Compensation,Incentives, and the Duality of Risk Aversion and Riskiness [ J ]. Journal of Finance,2004,59 (1) :207 - 225.

二级参考文献82

共引文献43

同被引文献83

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部