摘要
李梦阳的理欲同行说、《缶音序》;何景明的《心迹篇》、《师问》等是许多研究者认为二人具有反理学思想的主要依据,然李梦阳的"理欲同行而异情"是理学的传统命题;《缶音序》是从诗歌创作角度批评宋诗议论化的倾向;何景明的《心迹篇》是儒学"格物致知"和"理一分殊"的自我阐述;《师问》则是对人不对事地抨击不重素质、惟考是的的学校教育,总之,全面考析,上述资料都不能成为二人具有反理学思想的依据。
Li Mengyang said," the reason desire counterparts are sequencer'; "Fou tone heart'" of teachers asked are many researchers think that two people with the theory of main basis, but Li Mengyang's" science to peer different feelings" is the science of traditional proposition; Fou tone" from the poetry sequencer a creative point Of criticism about the tendency of poetry; He Jingming's" heart" is" of Confucianism thinking ; walking" and" a sub-Shu'self described; "asked master" is not about to attack, but the test is not heavy quality of school education, in short, comprehensive analysis, these data can';t be two people with tlae theory basis.
出处
《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第4期59-62,共4页
Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
基金
陕西省教育厅资助项目"明代中期关陇文人群体研究"(编号:11JK0240)
关键词
李梦阳
何景明
反理学
Li Mengyang
He Jingming
anti science