摘要
法律推理常处于一个由外部推理和内部推理织就的复杂网络中。法律推理作为一种有目的的实践活动,必须以法律事实为逻辑起点、以法律规范为准则、以法律价值为衡平,要求具备客观性、可预见性和一致性。法律事实认定、法律规范识别、法律价值论证是一个系统化的进程,价值原则始终作为主线贯串其中,不仅制约着推理体系的内在结构和逻辑关联,而且事关法律方法的活力与法治技术的发展。法律推理体系重心应定位于对案件事实的认定、对法律规范的选择以及在合法性与合理性张力下对法律价值的追寻。
Often in a complex network weaved by external reasoning and internal reasoning, legal rea- soning, as a purposeful practical activities, must regard legal facts as starting point, legal norms as a criterion, and legal value as the equity, so as to have objectivity, predictability and consistency. Le- gal findings of fact, the identification of legal norms, and legal value argument are a systematic process. The value of the principle, as the main line, always runs through, which not only restricts the internal structure and logic associated inference system, but also influences the legal method vitali- ty and the rule of law, the development of technology. The focus of legal reasoning system should be positioned on the facts of the case identified, the choice of legal norms, and the pursuit of legal value with legitimacy and rationality.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》
CAS
2012年第9期11-14,共4页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"法律推理研究"(ZD201201)的阶段性成果