期刊文献+

APACHE Ⅱ评分系统对内科急诊危重患者病情评估的价值及预后 被引量:6

The emergency critically ill patients prognosis assess by the APACHE Ⅱ score
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨APACHEⅡ评分系统评估急诊危重者病情的及治疗预后的价值。方法:以我院急诊科重症监护室2007年12月-2012年5月收治的120例患者作为研究对象,入室即开始进行APACHEⅡ评分,都采用内科综合治疗。结果:经治疗,本组120例患者,存活110例,死亡10例,死亡率为8.3%,死亡组和存活组APACHEⅡ评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),病死率随着评分的增加而增加(P<0.05)。结论:如何及时准确地评价急诊患者病情的严重程度和病死危险性,是急诊医生面临的一大问题。APACHE Ⅱ评分能较好地对急诊患者进行病情评估和预后判断。 Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of emergency critically ill patients prognosis assess by the APACHE Ⅱ score. Methods: Selected 120 cases admitted to the intensive care unit in my hospital emergency department from December 2007 to May 2012, Burglary started were began to APACHE Ⅱ score, and then used medical treatment. Results: After treatment, the survival were 110 cases 10 patients were died, the mortality rate was 8.3%, the APACHE Ⅱ scores between the death group and survival group were statistically significant (P 〈0.05), the mortality rate with the increase in the score increased (P 〈0.05). Conclusion: How to timely and accurately evaluation of emergency patients' severity of illness and death risk is big problem that faced by the emergency physician. The APACHE II score has better value of emergency patients for disease assessment and prognosis.
作者 梁俊斌
机构地区 东莞市道滘医院
出处 《求医问药(下半月刊)》 2012年第7期292-293,共2页 Seek Medical and Ask The Medicine
关键词 APACHEⅡ评分 急诊危重患者 预后 死亡 APACHE Ⅱ score emergency critically ill patients prognosis death
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1王长远,李俊芬,王晶,孙长怡,秦俭.SIRS评分与APACHEⅡ评分预测急诊危重病人预后的研究[J].中国医师进修杂志,2006,29(1):1-2. 被引量:20
  • 2Knaus W A, Draper E A, Wagner D P, et al. APACHE Ⅱ: a severity of disease classification system [J]. Crit Care Med, 1985, 13: 818.
  • 3Subbe C P, Kruger M, Rutherford P, et al. Validation of a modified early warning score in medical admissions [J]. Q J Med, 2001, 94: 521.
  • 4Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. The ACCP/SCCM Consenus Conference Committee: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Meal, 1992,20: 864.
  • 5Yoshirnoto Y, Tanaka Y, Hoya K. Acute systemic inflammatory response syndrome in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke, 2001,32 (9) :1989-1993.
  • 6黎沾良主编.现代危重病学.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1995.5.
  • 7Malone DL,Kuhls D,Napolitano LM,et al.Back to basics:validation of the admission systemic inflammatory response syndrome score in predicting outcome in trauma[J].J Trauma,2001,51(3):458-463.
  • 8Bilevicius E,Dragosavac D.Multiple organ failure in septic patients[J].Braz J Infect Dis,2001,5(3):103-110.
  • 9陈晓英.常用创伤评分法及其在创伤监护中的应用前景[J].国外医学(护理学分册),1998,17(6):253-255. 被引量:3
  • 10江学成.危重疾病严重程度评分临床应用和意义[J].中国危重病急救医学,2000,12(4):195-197. 被引量:287

共引文献223

同被引文献51

  • 1董勤亮,英秀红.危重病患者血清酶水平与APACHEⅡ评分关系的临床意义[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2004,11(6):384-384. 被引量:9
  • 2邱海波,陈德昌,陈俊豪.论危重病医学及其学科建设[J].中华医院管理杂志,2001,17(2):83-85. 被引量:31
  • 3汤日波,刘晓辉,谢莲娜,刘学田,秦颖,王中华,孙玉兰,钟雪焱,于晓峰,张军,侯丽萍.APACHEⅡ评分在急性冠脉综合征中的应用[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2005,14(8):682-683. 被引量:12
  • 4邓小明,李文志.危重病医学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:175-179.
  • 5王一瞠,李德馨,林桂芳,等.实用急诊学[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1992:56-68.
  • 6KNAUS W, DRAPER E A, WAGNER D P, et al. An evalua- tion of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers [J]. Ann Intern Med,1986,104(3) :410-418.
  • 7CAVALLAZZI R, MARIK P E, HIRANI A, et al. Associa tion between time of admission to the ICU and mortality[J] Chest, 2010,138(1) :68-75.
  • 8BELL C M, REDELMEIER D A. Mo admitted to hospitals on weekends as co rtality among patients mpared with weekdays [J]. N Engl J Med, 2001,345(9) :663-668.
  • 9BISBAL M, PAULY V, GAINNIER M, et al. Does admis- sion during morning rounds increase the mortality of patients in the medical ICU[J]? Chest, 2012,142(5):1179 1184.
  • 10BANERJEE R, NAESSENS J M, SEFERIAN E G, et al Economic implications of nighttime attending intensivist cover age in a medical intensive care unit[J]. Crit Care Med, 2011 39(6) :1257-1262.

引证文献6

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部