期刊文献+

基于机会项目标价值分布的选择自由测度研究 被引量:2

Appraisal to Freedom of Choice Based on the Distribution of Objective Value of Opportunities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于机会项效用的选择自由测度没有对价值与效用的概念进行区分。机会项的价值与机会项的效用实际上是两个既有联系又有区别的概念。机会项的价值具有三种形式,即机会项的目标价值、机会项的非目标价值以及机会项的参与人价值。基于机会项的目标价值分布,文章提出一种新的机会集选择自由测度方法;利用广义洛伦茨曲线确定机会集选择自由测度指标的参数。 The value and the utility of opportunity are distinct and related concepts. The value of opportunity has three forms, namely objective value, non-objective value and value to participant. Based on the distribution of objective value of opportunity, a news method of measuring freedom of choice is given and parameters in the model are determined by the generalized Lorenz curve.
机构地区 天津大学
出处 《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》 2012年第4期64-67,共4页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 机会集 选择自由 价值 广义洛伦茨曲线 opportunity sets freedom of choice value the generalized Lorenz curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1PATTANAIK P K, XU Yong-sheng. On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice[J]. Recherches conomiques de Louvain, 1990, (56): 383-390.
  • 2ROSENBAUM E F. On measuring freedom[J]. Journal of Theoretical Polities, 2000, (2): 205-227.
  • 3BOSSERT W, PATTANAIK P K, XU YONGSHENG. Similarity of options and the measurement of diversity[J]. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2003, (15): 405-422.
  • 4NEHRING K, PUPPE C. Diversity and dissimilarity in lines and hierarchies[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2003, (45): 167-183.
  • 5BERVOETS S, GRAVEL N. Appraising diversity with an ordinal notion of similarity : an axiomatic approach[J].Mathematical Social Sciences, 2007, (53): 259-273.
  • 6GUSTAFSSON J E. Freedom of choice and expected compromise[J].Soc Choice Welfare, 2010, (35): 65-79.
  • 7SUGDEN R. The metric of opportunity[J].Economics and Philosophy, 1998, (14): 307-337.
  • 8PATTANAIK P K, XU Yong-sheng. On preference and freedom[J]. Theory andDecision, 1998,(44): 173-198.
  • 9VAN HEES M. The specific value of freedom[J]. Social Choice Welfare, 2010, (35): 687-703.
  • 10PUPPE C. An axiomatic approach to 'preference for freedom of choice'[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1996, (68): 174-199.

共引文献4

同被引文献30

  • 1蒋清海.区域经济协调发展的若干理论问题[J].财经问题研究,1995(6):49-54. 被引量:40
  • 2阿玛蒂亚·森.论经济不平等/不平等之再考察[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.
  • 3中国社会科学院城镇化质量评估与提升路径研究创新项目组.中国城镇化质量综合评价报告[J].经济研究参考,2013(31):3-32.
  • 4ERLANDER S. Welfare, freedom of choice and composite utility in the logic model [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2005(24): 509-525.
  • 5FOSTER J E. Freedom, opportunity, and well-being [J]. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, 2011 (2): 687-728.
  • 6MIYAGISHIMA K. Ranking linear budget sets with different available goods: a note [J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2012, 63(3):234-238.
  • 7CHAMBERSA C P, HAYASHI T. Choice and individual welfare[J]. Journal of Economic Theory,2012, 147(5) 1818-1849.
  • 8XU YONGSHENG, TADENUMA K. Extensions of the fundamental welfare theorems in a non-welfaristic framework [J]. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 2012 (53):107-120.
  • 9BELASENA A R, HAFER R W. Well-being and economic freedom: evidence from the States [J]. Intelligence, 2012, 40(3):306-316.
  • 10CARTER I. Choice, freedom, and freedom of choice[J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2004(22): 61-81.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部