期刊文献+

喉罩在妇科腹腔镜手术中的应用 被引量:1

Application of laryngeal mask airway in gynecological laparoscopic surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较喉罩与气管导管对患者血流动力学的影响,探讨喉罩在妇科腹腔镜手术中的作用。方法:选择40例ASAⅠ、Ⅱ级择期行妇科腹腔镜手术的患者,随机分为喉罩组和气管导管组。比较麻醉诱导前(T0)、插气管导管或喉罩前(T1)、插气管导管或喉罩时(T2)、气腹开始时(T3)、术毕拔气管导管或喉罩时(T4)患者的SBP、DBP、HR、SpO2。分析术中的不良反应及术后咽喉部的并发症。结果:①与T0比较,在T2时气管导管组SBP、HR明显升高(P<0.05),T3、T4时气管导管组SBP明显升高(P<0.05),T3时HR下降(P<0.05)。②T2时喉罩组SBP、DBP、HR均明显低于气管导管组(P<0.05)。③喉罩组术后咽喉部疼痛的发生率低于气管导管组(P<0.05)。结论:喉罩置入时引起的心血管反应轻微,有利于维持血流动力学的平稳,术后并发症少。 Objective: Exploring application of laryngeal mask airway(LMA) in gynecological laparoscopic surgery by comparing the effects of laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube on hemodynamics in patients.Methods: 40 American standards association(ASA) classⅠ~Ⅱ patients who got gynecological laparoscopic procedures,were randomly assigned to the LMA group and the endotracheal intubation(EI) group.SBP,DBP,HR and the SpO2 were measured before the induction of anesthesia(T0),before tracheal intubation(T1),immediately after tracheal intubation(T2),at the beginning of the pneumoperitoneum(T3) and immediately after tracheal extubation(T4).The intraoperative adverse events and postoperative throat complications were analyzed.Results: In the EI group,SBP and HR at T2 were significantly higher than those at T0(P〈0.05),and the same as SBP at T3 and T4.However,HR at T3 was significantly lower than that at T0(P〈0.05).Compared with EI group,SBP,DBP,and HR significantly decreased in the LMA group at T2(P〈0.05).The incidence rate of postoperative sore throat in the LMA group were less than the EI group(P〈0.05).Conclusion: Laryngeal mask airway is beneficial to maintain stable hemodynamics for less cardiovascular response,and with fewer postoperative complications.
出处 《华夏医学》 CAS 2012年第4期550-553,共4页 Acta Medicinae Sinica
关键词 喉罩 气管导管 妇科 腹腔镜 血流动力学 laryngeal mask endotracheal tube gynecology laparoscope hemodynamic
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献38

  • 1陈伟,李卫,王健.七氟醚吸入麻醉联合喉罩在乳腺日间手术中的应用[J].华西医学,2008,23(5):1005-1006. 被引量:5
  • 2冯梅,蒋宗滨,冼海燕,梁桂宁,黄剑锋,张明明,张夏.二氧化碳气腹对血流动力学及心电图的影响[J].广西医科大学学报,2006,23(1):85-87. 被引量:5
  • 3Asai T, Editorial Ⅱ. Who is at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration? Br J Anaesth, 2004,93: 497-500.
  • 4Brimacombe J.喉罩麻醉原理与实践.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:506-520.
  • 5Brimaeombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, et al. Positive Pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway:a randomized crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg,2001,93:1351-1359.
  • 6Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, et al. The ProSeal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trail with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth, 2002, 88:534-539.
  • 7岳云,田鸣,左明章,等译.喉罩麻醉原理与实践.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:407-408.
  • 8Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantages of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoseopies. Can J Anaesth, 2006,53 : 188-193.
  • 9Van Zundert AA, Fonck K, Al-Shaikh B, et al. Comparison of the LMA-classie with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients. Anesthesiolo- gy, 2003,99 : 1066-1071.
  • 10Lange M, Smul T, Zimmermann P, et al. Effectiveness and patient comfort of the novel streamlined pharynx airway liner (SLIPA) compared with the conventional laryngeal mask air- way in opthalmic surgery. Anesth Analg, 2007,104 : 431-434.

共引文献166

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部