摘要
康德的意识现象学没有采取整体现象学的收缩路径,超出了现象世界,企图立足于人的有限的自我意识,经过现象世界的理论理性的认知把握和作为本质世界的实践理性的把握来实现存在理解。但是,康德的这种论证策略没有消除两者之间的矛盾,仍是一种二元分置、制衡般的平行主义存在理解策略。黑格尔的精神现象学则批驳了康德知性的存在理解,通过辩证法与精神现象学的有机结合,用总体性的现象学态度取代了康德分裂性的现象学态度,力图在思辨的层面上消除康德的理性困惑。
Kant’s consciousness phenomenology did not adopt the concentration route of the holism phenomenology,but transcended the phenomenon world, based on the limited self-consciousness, wanting to realize the understanding of the Being through the cognitive concept of the theoretical reason about the phenomenon world and the concept of the praxis reason about the essential world. But, this understanding strategy could not dispel the modernity contradiction, still one dualism and parallelism reconcilable strategy. Hegel’s spiritual phenomenology criticized Kant’s understanding of the Being, superseded the split phenomenological attitude of Kant with the spiritual phenomenology through the organic integration, and made effort to reconcilable the reasonable perplexity of Kant in the speculative perspective.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
2012年第5期92-101,159,共10页
Journal Of CUPL
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"马克思哲学的现象学思想研究"(09YJC720027)
山西省高等学校优秀青年学术带头人支持计划基金项目"马克思的实践本体论研究--兼论中国特色的社会主义理论的哲学基础"资助