期刊文献+

蕴涵量表法在HSK阅读理解测验公平性研究中的应用 被引量:2

Using Implicational Scaling Procedure to Detect the Differential Passage Difficulty Order on the Reading Comprehension Test of HSK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 阅读理解能力测验中所选择的文章在内容方面对不同专业背景的考生亚团体是否具有公平性的问题,是测验效度高低的重要证据,也是测验效度验证(validation)的重要环节。本研究以中国语言与文学专业考生为目标组,分别将经济学专业和生物医学专业考生作为参照组,采用效标测量和蕴涵量表分析相结合的方法,对HSK(高等)阅读理解测验的文章难度对三个不同专业背景的考生组的公平性问题进行了检验。研究结果表明,两个参照组考生尽管具有各自的相对专业优势,但他们在六篇阅读材料上获得的难度排列顺序与目标组考生完全一致;虽然目标组考生不具备汉语知识以外的其他专业优势,但因为HSK考试所选择的阅读材料没有涉及语言知识本身以外的特殊专业要求,因而测验对三个不同专业背景的考生具有较高的公平性。 As a state-level standardized test, the Chinese Proficiency Test (HSK) is designed to measure the general language proficiency of those whose native language is not Chinese. But within these groups there may be subgroups that differ in ways other than the language ability of interest. These differences may affect their test performance, and hence the validity of inferences made on the basis of test scores. When this systematic difference in test performance occurs that appear to be associated with characteristics not logically related to the ability in question, we must fully investigate the possibility that the test is biased. This research, based on the evaluation of examinees' reading proficiency levels through their teachers,using implicational scaling procedure, specifically addresses itself to the investigation of fairness for three subgroups: Chinese and Chinese literature group, economics and business group, and biology and medicine group, on the reading comprehension test of HSK. The empirical research indicates that the difficulty order of six passages is completely same across the three subgroups, the implicational scaling procedure could be used to detect differential item or passage functioning.
作者 柴省三
出处 《考试研究》 2012年第5期54-62,共9页 Examinations Research
基金 北京语言大学校级科研项目(项目编号:11YB01)研究成果之一
关键词 蕴涵量表 测验公平性 阅读理解测验 HSK 构念效度 测验偏差 Implicational Scaling, Test Fairness, Reading Comprehension Test, HSK, Construct Validity, Test Bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Shealy, R. & Stout, W. , A model-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF [ J ], Psychometrika, 1993,58 (2), 159 - 194.
  • 2Dorans, N. J. & Kulick, E. M. , Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test [ J ] , Journal of Educational Measurement, 1986,23 ( 2 ) , 355 - 368.
  • 3Holland, P. W. & Thayer, D. T. , Differential item functioning and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure, In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.),Test validity[C], (pp. 129 - 145), Hillsdale, NJ : Laurence Erlbaum, 1988.
  • 4Dorans, N. J. & Kulick, E. M. , Assessing unexpected differential item performance of female candidates on SAT and TSWE forms administered in December 1977:An application of the standardization approach (ETS Research Report RR -88 - 9 ) [ R ] , Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service, 1983.
  • 5Wainer, H. , Brandlow, E. T. & Wang, X. , Testlet response theory and its applications[ M ], New York : Cambridge University Press ,2007.
  • 6Geranpayeh, A. & Kunnan, A. J, Differential item functioning in terms of age in the Certificate in Advanced English Examination [ J ] , Language Assessment Quarterly, 2007,4 (2) , 190 - 222.
  • 7任杰,谢小庆.中国少数民族考生与外国考生HSK成绩的公平性分析[J].心理学探新,2002,22(2):51-56. 被引量:14
  • 8郭树军(1989).HSK阅读理解试题的设计,见《汉语水平考试(HsK)研究》,北京:现代出版社.
  • 9Alderson, J. C. , Assessing Reading [ M ] , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,2000.
  • 10Pae, T. I. , DIF for examinees with different academic backgrounds [ J ], Language Testing,2004,21 ( 1 ) ,53 - 73.

二级参考文献14

  • 1曾秀芹,孟庆茂.项目功能差异及其检测方法[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(2):41-47. 被引量:27
  • 2董圣鸿,马世晔.三种常用DIF检测方法的比较研究[J].心理学探新,2001,21(1):43-48. 被引量:21
  • 3Chang H,J Educat Measarement,1996年,33卷,333--353页
  • 4曾秀芹 孟庆茂.项目功能差异的简介[J].心理学探新,1998,(1).
  • 5Hua-Hua Chang,John Mazzeo,Louis Roussos.Detecting DIF for Polytomously Scored Item:An Adaptation of the SIBTEST Procedure[J].Journal of Educational Measurement, Fall,1996.
  • 6Neil J.Dorans, Paul W.Holland.DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standardization[A].Differential Item Functioning[C].Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersy,1993.
  • 7Kathleen A,O'Neill, W Miles Mcpeek).Item and Test Charateristics That are Associated with Differential Item Functioning[A].Differential Item Functioning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale,New Jersy.Journal of Educational Measurement, Summer 1996.
  • 8Roussos, Stout.Simulation Studies of the Effects of Small Sample Size and Studied Item Qrqmeters on SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenszel Type 1 Error Performance,1995.
  • 9教育部考试中心资料室.教育考试图书资料摘编(合订本)[C].1997.
  • 10[11]Hua-Hua Chang, John Mazzeo, Louis Roussos. Detecting DIF for PolytomouslyScored Items: An Adaptation of the SIBTESY Procedure[J] .Journal of EducationalMeasurement, 1996.

共引文献56

同被引文献37

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部