摘要
本文运用DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法对5个油葵品种在3种类型土壤上的种植表现进行了综合分析.结果表明,5个油葵品种表现为:在褐土上,S606>T012 244>S625>MAT414>矮大头518;草甸土上,T012 244>MAT414>S606、S625>矮大头518;水稻土上,S625、MAT414>矮大头518、S606>T012244.这两种综合评价方法的评判结果基本相同,并与品种实际表现相符.但灰色关联度评价结果中品种间差异不大,而DTOPSIS法评价结果中Ci值差异十分明显,说明在品种比较评价的优劣上,DTOPSIS法比灰色关联度法更加准确。
By DTOPSIS and Gray Relation Analysis ( GRA), we deal with the comprehensive evaluation of the performances with five types of oil sunflowers cultivated in three types of soil. The results show that three different sequencings, such as in Brown Soil, S606 〉T012 244 〉 S625 〉 MAT414 〉 Aidatou 518; in Meadow Soil, T012 244 〉 MAT414 〉 S606,S625 〉 Aidatou 518; in Paddy Soil, S625, MAT414 〉 Aidato 518, S606 〉 T012 244. Comprehensive evaluation results With the two evaluation method are basically same, and are compatible with the actual performances. However, the discrepancy of Ci Value shows that the evaluation results of DTOPSIS is more evident than that of GRA, which can help illustrate that, on comparative evaluation of the quality differ- ent among cultivated varieties, DTOPSIS is more accurate than Gray Relation Analysis.
出处
《山西师范大学学报(自然科学版)》
2012年第3期79-84,共6页
Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
关键词
油葵
品种比较
DTOPSIS法
灰色关联度法
土壤适应性
oil sunflower
cultivated varieties comparison
DTOPSIS
gray relation analysis (GRA)
comprehensive evalua- tion
soil suitability