期刊文献+

外显义的发展及不可取消性考察 被引量:2

The Study on the Development and Non-Cancellability of Explicature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 外显义是后格莱斯语用学理论发展的产物,体现了由语义和语用划分的争论向语用发展的趋势。可取消性是格莱斯提出用来判定会话含义的经典标准,部分学者认为它也可用来检验外显义。从意图的角度考察外显义发现,外显义是语言意义和语境意义组合而成的作为说话者意图表达的一个载体,因而可消除的只是听话者对说话者的意图进行推断的可能意图;而说话者的意图是不可取消的,因此蕴含明确意图的外显义是不能被取消的。 Explicature is one of the most important achieves of Post-Gricean theories, while Cancellability is a classic criteria contributed by Grice, through which conversational implicature is verified. This paper adopts this rule to see if explicature also has cancellability or not. By studying other' views, we finds that it is more plausible to test canceUability with intention, and the result shows that the speaker's intention is not cancellable, so is explicature.
作者 周红辉
出处 《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2012年第5期44-48,共5页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
基金 教育部社科青年基金项目(10YJC740144) 湛江师范学院博士专项基金(W11701)
关键词 外显义 隐含义 交际意图 不可取消性 Explicature Implicature Inference Non-cancellability
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Grice, H. P. Studies in the Way of Words [ M ]. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1989 : 39 - 40.
  • 2Bach, K. Semantic Slack : What is Said and More [ C ] // S. L. Tsohatzidis. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London : Routledge, 1994:267 - 291,251,287.
  • 3Levinson, Stephen, C. Presumptive Meanings : The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature [ M ]. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press ,2000:371 - 374,372.
  • 4Recanati, F. Perspectival Thought : A Plea for ( Moderate ) Relativism[ M ]. Oxford : OUP,2007 : 1 - 27,6.
  • 5Stainton, Robert, J. Using Non-sentences : An Application of Relevance Theory[J]. Pragmatics & Cognition, 1994, ( 2 ) : 269 - 284.
  • 6Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. Relevance Theory [ M ]. Oxford : Blackwell. Reprinted with postface, 1995 : 176 - 183.
  • 7Bach, K. You Don't Say? [ J ]. Synthese, 2001, ( 128 ) : 15 -44.
  • 8Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. Insensitive Semantics : a Defence of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism [ M ]. Oxford : Blackwel1,2005 : 1 - 10.
  • 9Montminy, M. Semantic Content, Truth Conditions and Context [ J ]. Linguistics & Philosophy,2006, (29) : 1 - 26.
  • 10Carston, R. Thoughts and Utterances:the Pragmatics of Explicit Communication [ M ]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002a: 117.

同被引文献29

  • 1Agerri,R.&K.Korta.Pragmatically determined aspects of meaning:Explicature,impliciture or implicature[A].ILCLI&UPV-EHU Donosita,2004.
  • 2Bach,K.Conversational impliciture[J].Mind and Language,1994(9):124-62.
  • 3Burton-Roberts,N.Cancellation and intention[J].Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics,2006:1-12.
  • 4Burton-Roberts,N.On Grice and cancellation[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2013(48):17-28.
  • 5Capone,A.Are explicatures cancellable?Toward a theory of the speaker's intentionality[J].Intercultural Pragmatics,2009(6):55-83.
  • 6Capone,A.What can modularity of mind tell us about the Semantics/Pragmatics Debate?[J].Australian Journal of Linguistics,2010(30):497-520.
  • 7Capone,A.Explicatures are NOT cancellable[A].In Capone,A.,Lo Piparo,F.&M.Carapezza(eds).Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics[C].Springer,2013:131-151.
  • 8Carston,R.Implicature,explicature and truththeoretic semantics[A].In Kempson,R.(ed).Mental Representations[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1988:155-181.
  • 9Carston,R.Thoughts and Utterances:The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication[M].Oxford:Blackwell,2002.
  • 10Carston,R.Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature[A].In Bianchi,C.(ed).The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction[C].CSLI Publications,2004:65-100.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部