期刊文献+

真实环境条件下溢油风化规律 被引量:3

Weathered regulation of oil spilled in actual environment
原文传递
导出
摘要 在2010年7月16日大连输油管道爆炸事故发生后,分别于事故油罐、溢油发生后1 d、5 d、9 d的海面厚油膜区域以及溢油事故发生后15 d、23 d、210 d的岸滩石油重污染区域采集原始油样及溢油样品。采用气相色谱质谱联用(GC-MS)对样品中的生物标志物进行了检测,对常规生物标志物特征比值的变化趋势进行分析。结果表明:在为期9 d的海面溢油风化过程中nCl7/Pr、nC18/Ph、Pr/Ph、奥利烷/藿烷、C2-D/C2-P、C3-D/C3-P和ΣP/ΣD受风化影响较大(相对标准偏差值均在10%~20%范围内);在为期210 d的岸滩溢油风化过程中C17/Pr和nC18/Ph受风化影响最大(相对标准偏差值均大于50%),奥利烷/藿烷、C2-D/C2-P、C3-D/C3-P、ΣP/ΣD和2-MP/1-MP受风化影响较大(相对标准偏差值均在10%~30%范围内);Pr/Ph在不同环境介质中的风化过程存在显著差异。 The crude and oil spilled samples were collected from the oilcan, the thick film regions after the oil spill occurred on 2010 Jul. 16th 1 day, 5 days and 9 days and the heavy oil contaminated area of beach after the oil spill occurred for 15 days, 23 days and 210 days. The trends of the ratios of the weathered oils, and biomarkers were analyzed by GC-MS. The results showed that nC17/Pr, nC18/Ph, Pr/Ph, 18α(H)-oleanane/17α(H) ,21β(H)-hopane, C2-D/C2-P, C3-D/C3-P and ΣP/ΣD in the weathered oils at the sea were influenced signally for 9 days-weathering process, nC17/Pr and nC18/Ph in the weathered oils on the beach were influenced much more signally for 210 days-weathering process, and the 18a(H) -oleanane/17a(H) ,21β(H) -hopane, C2-D/C2-P, C3-D/C3- P, ΣP/ΣD and 2-MP/1-MP were influenced signally for 210 days-weathering process. The weathering processes of Pr/Ph in different environment were significant differences.
出处 《海洋环境科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期686-691,共6页 Marine Environmental Science
基金 海洋公益性项目:沿海危险化学品污染事件海洋预案支撑技术研究与应用示范(201005034)
关键词 风化 生物标志物 特征比值 溢油鉴别 weathering biomarker characteristic ratio oil spill identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献73

共引文献61

同被引文献46

  • 1罗霞,马启敏,张传松.短期风化作用下轻质原油化学组成的变化[J].海洋环境科学,2008,27(2):173-177. 被引量:15
  • 2廖蔚峰,慎义勇.废矿物油的处理处置[J].中国资源综合利用,2006,24(12):17-20. 被引量:11
  • 3GB/T21247-2007,海面溢油鉴别系统规范[S].
  • 4WANG Z D,FINGAS M. Study of the effects of weathenng on the chemical composition of a light crude oil using GC/MS and GC/ FID [ J]. Micro column Sep, 1995,7:617-639.
  • 5WANG Z D, FINGAS M, DAVID S. Oil spill identification [ J ]. Journal of Chromatography A, 1999,843 : 369-411.
  • 6WANG Z D,FINGAS M,et al. Comparison of oil composition changes due to biodegradation and physical weathering in different oils [J]. Journal of Chromatography A,1998 ,809 :89-107.
  • 7YIM U H, HA S Y, AN J G, et al. Fingerprint and weathering characteristics of stranded oils after the Hebei Spirit oil spill [ J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials ,2011,197:60-69.
  • 8FERNA' NDEZ-VARELA R, ANDRADEA J M, MUNIATEGUI S, et al. The comparison of two heavy fuel oils in composition and weathering pattern,based on IR, GC-FID and GC-MS analyses: Application to the Prestige wreckage [ J]. Water Research ,2009, 43 : 1015-1026.
  • 9LEMKAU K L,PEACOCK E E,NELSON R K,et al. The M/V Cosco Busan spill:Source identification and short-term fate [ J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin,2010, 60:2123-2129.
  • 10孙培艳,高振会,崔文林,等.《油指纹鉴别技术发展及应用》[M].北京:海洋出版社,2007.

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部