期刊文献+

西乐葆在下颌第三磨牙拔除术后镇痛中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Celebrex in the pain control in patients treated by extraction of mandibular third molar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较西乐葆与芬必得在下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛控制中的有效性和安全性。纳入231例下颌第三磨牙拔除的患者,随机分为2组,分别服用西乐葆胶囊和芬必得胶囊。结果显示2种药物均有镇痛效果(P<0.05);西乐葆组与芬必得组的镇痛效果在给药后2、24、48、72 h均没有差别(P>0.05);西乐葆组腹痛和腹泻发生率低于芬必得组(P<0.05)。表明西乐葆与芬必得的镇痛效果相当,但西乐葆的不良反应发生率低于芬必得。 The effect and safety of Celebrex and Fenbid in the pain control in patients treated by mandibular impacted wisdom tooth extraction were observed in 231 cases. The results showed that the two drugs had analgesic effect( P 〈 0.05 ) , no difference in the analgesic effect was found between Celebrex group(n = 117) and Fenbid group(n = 114) 2, 24, 48 and 72 h after administration(P 〉0.05). Abdominal pain and diarrhea rates in Celebrex group were lower than those in Fenbid group( P 〈 0.05 ).
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期651-653,共3页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 西乐葆 芬必得 下颌第三磨牙 拔牙 术后镇痛 Celebrex Fenbid Mandibular impacted wisdom teeth Extraction Postoperative analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1胡开进,孔亮,彭莲,王新木,秦瑞峰,周宏志,杨立峰.口腔组织补片置入拔牙创预防术后并发症[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(2):214-216. 被引量:19
  • 2李涛,江莉婷,陈玉华,高月丽,王彩娣,孙琳.两种手术径路在水平阻生牙拔除中的选择[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2007,17(2):149-152. 被引量:13
  • 3Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Swinson B, et al. Experience versus complication rate in third molar surgery[ J]. Head Face Med, 2006, 2 : 14.
  • 4Kilpatrick HC. Removal of impacted third molars utilizing speeds up to 200,000 r/min[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1958, 11(4):364-369.
  • 5Karaca I, Simsek S, Ugar D, et al. Review of flap design influence on the health of the periodontium after mandibular third molar surgery [ J ]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007, 104( 1 ) :18 -23.
  • 6Ren YF, Malmstrom HS. Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(10) :1909 - 1021.
  • 7Peterson LJ. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery [ M ]. 4th ed. New York : Elsevier Mosby,2003 : 184 - 214.
  • 8Baqain ZH, Karaky AA, Sawair F, et al. Frequency estimates and risk factors for postoperative morbidity after third molar removal: A prospective cohort study [ J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008,66( 11 ) :2276 -2283.
  • 9Sands T, Pynn BR, Nenniger S. Third molar surgery: Current concepts and controversies, Part 2[J]. Oral Health, 1993, 83(5) :19, 21 -22, 27 -30.
  • 10Anon. Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: Is it justified? [J]. Br J Orthod, 1999,26(2) :149 - 151.

共引文献113

同被引文献16

  • 1Yuasa H,Sugiura M.Clinical postoperative findings after removal of impacted mandibular third molars:prediction of postoperative facial swelling and pain based on preoperative variables[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2004,42(3):209-214.
  • 2Yuasa H,Kawai T,Sugiura M.Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,40(1):26-31.
  • 3Garcia G A,Gude S F,Gandara R J,et al.Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1997,55(11):1123-1126.
  • 4Lago-Méndez L,Diniz-Freitas M,Senra-Rivera C,et al.Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(5):979-983.
  • 5Akadiri O A,Obiechina A E.Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery—a systematic review[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2009,67(4):771-774.
  • 6Gbotolorun O M,Arotiba GT,Ladeinde A L.Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(10):1977-1983.
  • 7周宏志,胡开进,秦瑞峰,孔亮.下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除难度预判[J].口腔医学研究,2009,25(3):327-329. 被引量:27
  • 8刘兴翠,高玉萍,鲁伟.下颌阻生智齿拔除术并发症原因分析[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2011,21(3):189-191. 被引量:30
  • 9贾剑巍,赵露露.布洛芬在缓解口腔正畸分牙后疼痛相关性研究[J].中国医学创新,2012,9(35):26-27. 被引量:4
  • 10陈丽.预防性护理干预对拔牙术并发症的影响[J].中国基层医药,2013,20(3):466-467. 被引量:4

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部