孔墨批判的批判——《十批判书》的批判

On KongFuzi and Mozi ——A disscussion on Guo Moruo's Book:Cristicism on The Ten Question

儒墨对立由来已久。 2 0 0 0年来 ,人们扬孔抑墨 ,以儒学为正统 ,视墨家如尊卑无别的禽兽。近 50年来由于工农地位的改变 ,人们又尊墨抑孔 ,以墨子为劳苦大众的代言人 ,而孔子是腐朽阶级的代表。郭沫若以他的师心独见 ,发现人们对孔墨历来有太多的偏见。他力图打破前人的模式 ,重建历史真实。但他所逆转的只是结论 ,在研究方法上 ,并没有冲出主观性学术的樊篱。当 2 0世纪将结束的时候 ,我们有必要从原始文本出发 ,还孔墨以真实 ,并以当代中国发展为出发点 。

Rujia School and Mojia School had been against each other for many years.In two thousand years of ancient times,most of Chinese respected Rujia School,but looked Mojia School like animals that don't know who is more intimate and more respective.In recently fifty years,because of revolution,many Chinese took Mozi as the speaker of workers and peasants,but KongFuzi as the representative of the decline noble.Guo Moruo know that peoele had too many prejudice to both Kong Fuzi and Mozi,and tried to give us a new conclusion.But his theorty had not different with the old one.When 20 centry go by ,we need to find the reality Kong Fuzi and Mozi,and the common home they had to return to .