期刊文献+

组织学习对员工—组织匹配的影响——知识惯性调节作用的实证研究 被引量:20

The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Inertia on the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Employee-organization Fit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文实证研究组织学习对员工—组织匹配的影响及知识惯性的调节作用。研究发现学习承诺、分享愿景和开放心智对一致性匹配和互补性匹配具有显著正向影响;经验惯性和学习惯性在学习承诺、分享愿景和开放心智对一致性匹配的影响有负向调节作用。 Employee-organization fit is a research topic that has been paid much attention by both scholars and managers. Although the current research has primarily focuses on its concept, structure, content and outcomes, little research has examined its antecedents. Several antecedents at both individual and organizational levels may affect employee-organization fit during the early hiring stage. This paper is interested in examining the impact of organizational learning on employee-organization fit. Employees can obtain knowledge, skill, attitude and value from organizational learning, and consequently have higher level of employee-organization fit through performing more behaviors that meet an organization's requirements. Therefore, the authors hypothesize that organizational learning has positive effect on employee-organization fit. Moreover, people often have knowledge inertia (including experience inertia and learning inertia) during the process of learning, which may moderate the relationship between organizational learning and employee-organization fit. Experience inertia occurs when an individual intends to use old ways to deal with new problems or new situations. As people with higher experience inertia don't want to change their ways of learning, their experience inertia may decrease the effect of organizational learning on their employee-organization fit. On the contrary, People with higher learning inertia intend to learn new knowledge, new method and new idea. This may consequently promote their competence and make their attitudes and behaviors consistent with organization's requirements. Therefore learning inertia may strengthen the relationship between organizational learning and employee-organization fit. A survey was used to test our proposed research hypotheses. The questionnaire contains demographic questions and questions assessing organizational learning, employee-organization fit and knowledge inertia. Organizational learning includes three dimensions: learning commitment, shared vision, and opening mind model. Employee-organization fit is composed of two dimensions: supplementary fit and complementary fit. Knowledge inertia has two dimensions: experience inertia and learning inertia. A total of 780 questionnaires were delivered to employees in 16 companies and 538 valid questionnaires were collected, with a response rate of68.97%. Statistical test shows that all the scales in the questionnaire have good reliability and construct validity. The results show that all three dimensions of organizational learning have positive effect on supplementary fit and complementary fit. In addition, both experience inertia and learning inertia decrease the degree of relationship between organizational learning and supplementary fit. This study makes contributions to the current literature by examining organizational learning as an antecedent of employee- organization fit. Future research may want to examine other antecedents, such as real job preview and newcomer training, for employee- organizational fit.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期7-14,95,共9页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70802010)
关键词 组织学习 员工—组织匹配 一致性匹配 互补性匹配 知识惯性 organizational learning employee-organization fit consistency fit complementary fit knowledge inertia
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1陆小雨,王端旭.人与组织匹配研究进展[J].技术经济与管理研究,2006(2):25-26. 被引量:4
  • 2王占玲,谈谦.人与组织匹配的研究[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2007,9(3):22-25. 被引量:12
  • 3Muchinsky PM, Monahan CJ. What is person-environment congruence supplementary versus complementary models of fit [ J ]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1987,31 ( 3 ) :268 - 277.
  • 4Edwards JR. Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review,and methodological critique [ J ]. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1991,16 ( 4- ) : 283 - 357.
  • 5Kristof AL. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualization, measurement, and implications [ J]. PersonnelPsychology, 1996,49 ( 1 ) : 1 - 30 ) o.
  • 6March JG, Simon H. Organizations [ J ]. Blackwell Business, 1958 : 324.
  • 7阿吉瑞斯.组织学习.张莉,李萍译.第2版[M].中国人民大学出版社,2002:356~365.
  • 8Fiol CM, Lyles MA. Organizational learning [ J ]. Academy of Management Review. 1985,10:803 - 813.
  • 9Stata R. Organizational learning-- The key to management innovation[ Jl - Sloan Management Review. 1989 ,Spring:63 - 74.
  • 10Kim WC. Making Global Strategies Work [ J ]. Sloan Management Review. 1993,34 : 11 - 28.

二级参考文献137

  • 1龙立荣,方俐洛,凌文辁.企业员工自我职业生涯管理的结构及关系[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):183-191. 被引量:94
  • 2陈国权,郑红平.组织学习影响因素、学习能力与绩效关系的实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):48-61. 被引量:136
  • 3[1]de Geus A P. Planning as Learning. Harvard business review, 1988, March-April: 70~74
  • 4[2]Senge P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday Currency. New York, 1990
  • 5[3]March J, Simon H. Organizations . New York: Wiley, 1958
  • 6[4]Argyris C, Schon D A Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading: Massachusetts, 1978
  • 7[5]Hedberg R. How organizations learn and unlearn. In: Nystrom P C, Starbuck W H ed. Handbook of Organizational Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981
  • 8[6]Pedler M, Burgoyne J, Boydell T. The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development, London: McGraw-Hill,1991
  • 9[7]Marquardt M J. Building The Learning Organization: a system approach to quantum improvement and global success, London: McGraw-Hill, 1996
  • 10[9]Huber G P. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 1991,2: 88~115

共引文献3651

同被引文献436

引证文献20

二级引证文献286

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部