期刊文献+

经腹小切口在大子宫肌瘤剔除术中的临床应用研究 被引量:4

Clinical application of mini-laparotomy myomectomy for large uterine fibroid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察经腹小切口行肌瘤剔除术在治疗大子宫肌瘤中的临床应用疗效。方法回顾分析2010年1月至2011年12月收治的肌瘤直径≥8 cm的子宫肌瘤患者的临床资料,21例为研究组,行经腹小切口子宫肌瘤剔除术,与同期12例腹腔镜下肌瘤剔除术,35例经腹肌瘤剔除术进行对比,观察临床指标。结果研究组术中出血量、手术时间、术后复发率较经腹组差异无统计学意义,但术后肛门排气时间、住院费用较经腹组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);研究组术中出血量、手术时间、住院费用、术后复发率与腔镜组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01,<0.05)但术后肛门排气时间与腹腔镜组无显著差异。结论经腹小切口行肌瘤剔除术优于经腹组,较腔镜组可以剔除体积更大、数目更多、生长部位更复杂的子宫肌瘤,是一种操作简单、容易掌握、值得推广的技术。 Objective To observe the clinical effects of mini - laparotomy myomectomy for large myoma of uterus. Methods Retro- spective analysis the clinical data of 68 patients who suffering from uterine fibroids which fibroids diameter ≥ 8cm from January 2010 to December 2011 in our hospital, in which, 21 cases for the study group, passing through mini - laparotomy myomectomy, compa,'ed with 12 cases using laparoscopic myomectomy and 35 cases of laparotomy myomectomy patients at the same period, observed the clinical indicators. Results Compared with the laparotomy myomectomy group, there are no statistical difference in the blood loss, duration of operation and recurrence rate, but the results of postoperative anorectum exhaust time and hospital fees reduced significantly in study group. The results of blood loss, duration of operation, hospital fees and recurrence rate in study group are lower than the laparoscopic myomectomy group ( P 〈 0.05 ), but there are no statistical difference in the results of postoperative anorectum exhaust time in two groups. Conclusion The clinical effects of mini -laparotomy myomectomy have more advantages than laparotomy myomectomy, can be excluded the uterine fibroid which have greater volume and number and more complex parts easier than laparoscopic myomectomy. This is a simple and easy -to -perform technique.
作者 夏咏梅
出处 《安徽医学》 2012年第8期986-989,共4页 Anhui Medical Journal
关键词 腹壁小切口 子宫肌瘤剔除术 大子宫肌瘤 Mini - laparotomy Myomectomy Large uterine fibroid
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献21

  • 1郎景和.妇科腹腔镜手术的现状、争议和发展[J].中华妇产科杂志,1996,31(6):323-326. 被引量:312
  • 2Falcone T,Bedaiwy MA. Minimally invasive management of uterine fibroids [ J ]. Curt Opin Obstet Gynecol,2002,14:401-407.
  • 3Reich H,Thompson KA, Natonpsky LG, et al. 1 aparoscopic myomectomy:an alternative to laparotomy myomectomy or hysterectomy[J]. Gynaecol Endoscopy,1997,6:7-12.
  • 4Seinera P, Arisio R, Decko A,et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: indications, surgical technique and complications[ J ]. Hum Reprod,1997, 12: 1927-1929.
  • 5Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial evaluate benefits in early outcome [ J ]. AmJ Obstet Gynecol, 1996,174: 654-658.
  • 6Holzer A. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy : a double-blind study to evaluate postoperative pain [ J]. Anesth Analg,2006, 102(5 ) : 1480-1484.
  • 7Shimanuki H. Effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound in reducing recurrent fibroids during laparoscopic myomectomy [ J ]. J Reprod Med,2006, 51 (9) :683-688.
  • 8Magos AL,Bournas N, Sinha R,et al. Vaginal myomectomy[ J ]. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1994,101 : 1092-1094.
  • 9Davies A, Hart R, Magos AL. The excision of uterine fibroids by vaginal myomectomy : a prospective stucy [ J ]. Fertil Stefil, 1999, 71:961-964.
  • 10Rovio PH, Heinonen PK. Transvaginal myomectomy with screw traction by colpotomy [ J ]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2006, 273 (4) :211-215.

共引文献193

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部