摘要
杜甫是狂人 ,然而与魏晋狂士阮籍相比 ,杜甫的狂主要表现为政治上的狂傲 ,阮籍的狂则多表现为“痴” ,即对礼的亵渎。二者的形成均有其社会原因。杜甫亦具有闲逸情调。与陶渊明相比 ,陶选择闲适的田园生活是选择生命的永恒价值 ,而杜甫则为关心政治之余的闲适生活体验。另外 ,杜甫还信佛 ,但是他并没有把自己真正交付给佛教。
Du Fu is a wild man. Contrast to Ruan Ji, a wild man in Wei and Jin dynasty, Du expresses his wildness in politics ,and Ruan's wildness is crazy , a blasphemy against ceremony. The formation of the two are both provided with social reasons. Du also possesses leisure sentimentalism. Tao Yuanming's choosing idyllic life is choosing eternal value of life, in contrast, Du's leisure is learning through his leisure life after concerning himself with politics. Moreover, Du believes in Buddhism, but he does't really give himself to Buddhism .
出处
《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2000年第3期53-57,共5页
Journal of Hubei Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Sciences