期刊文献+

《老残游记》“揭清官之恶”来源考辩 被引量:1

An Investigation of the Source of Exposing Incorruptible Officials' Evil in The Travel Notes of Lao Can
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在明清两代人们已经普遍认识到"清官之恶",揭露"清官之恶"的文献大量见于笔记、小说、词话、随笔、奏折等,已成为常识与常论,《老残游记》中的"揭清官之恶"不过是在这个背景下顺理成章得出的结论而已。考诸史实,"揭清官之恶"并非一定来源于李贽、袁枚等,因为这在当时已经是一种显见的共识。 In Ming and Qing Dynasty people had generally realized "the evil of incorruptible officials" and it is common sense that the literature exposing the evil of incorruptible officials could often be seen in numerous notes, novels, tales, essays, memorials, etc. Therefore, the exposure of the incorruptible officials' evil in The Travels Notes of Lao Can was just a natural conclusion reached in this context. By examining various historical facts, it is known that "exposing the evil of incorruptible officials" is not necessarily derived from Li Zhi and Yuan Mei, because such exposure was an obvious consensus then.
作者 刘洪强
出处 《嘉兴学院学报》 2012年第4期67-71,共5页 Journal of Jiaxing University
关键词 老残游记 揭清官之恶 李贽 考辨 The Travels Notes of Lao Can exposing the evil of incorruptible officials Li Zhi investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献20

  • 1郭成康.宁用操守平常的能吏,不用因循误事的清官──雍正对用人之道的别一种见解[J].清史研究,2001(4):33-42. 被引量:14
  • 2康瑞琮.《阅微草堂笔记》初探[J].天津师大学报,1983,3(2):64-69. 被引量:5
  • 3[22]刘鹗.老残游记.济南:齐鲁书社,1981.
  • 4[3][4][5][6][7][8]清史稿.上海:上海古籍出版社影印关外二次本,1986.
  • 5[11]史记.上海:上海古籍出版社影印武英殿本<二十四史>本,1986.
  • 6汉书.上海:上海古籍出版社影印武英殿本<二十四史>本,1986.
  • 7罗大经.鹤林玉露.扬州:江苏广陵古籍刻印社重印<笔记小说大观>,1983.
  • 8朱熹.宋名臣言行录.上海:上海古籍出版社影印<四库全书>本,1987.
  • 9谭正璧.三言二拍资料.上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 10[19][20]杨慎.升庵集.上海:上海古籍出版社影印<四库全书>本,1987.

共引文献74

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部