摘要
无论从刑事立法、客观情况、社会相当性,还是从危险驾驶罪的性质上看,危险驾驶罪的主观方面都不能说是纯粹的故意或过失。危险驾驶罪是一种严格责任的犯罪,不苛求是故意还是过失。醉驾不适用但书规定,追逐竞驶适用但书规定。醉驾标准应科学化,应该根据行为人主观恶性、行为的危险性、行为造成或可能造成的危害结果来判断追逐竞驶的情节恶劣。
The subjective aspect of dangerous driving crime cannot be regarded as pure intention, or pure negligence from the perspective of criminal legislation, the objective situation or social relevance. Dangerous driving crimes belong to the liability offences strictly, paying less attention to intention or negligence. The saving clause cannot apply to drunkenness; however, it applies to joyriding. The standards of drunkenness driving should be scientific. And the circumstances of joyriding should be judged from the mental situation, the degree of the behaviour and consequences it caused, and so on.
出处
《新疆财经大学学报》
2012年第3期32-37,54,共7页
Journal of Xinjiang University of Finance & Economics
基金
新疆维吾尔自治区哲学社会科学研究规划基金资助项目"中国刑法知识转型兼及和谐社会建设研究"(项目编号:11BFX059)的研究成果之一
关键词
故意
过失
严格责任
但书
危险驾驶罪
intention
negligence
strict liability
the saving clause
dangerous driving crime