期刊文献+

面向争议领域的军事威慑信号博弈分析 被引量:2

Military Deterrence Signaling Game Analysis Based on Argumentative Domains
下载PDF
导出
摘要 围绕争议领域蕴藏的丰厚价值,有关国家不断展开军事博弈。基于此,分析了威慑方为捍卫主权完整可能采用的威慑方式和被威慑方为应对威慑恐吓而采取的对策,构建了基于争议领域的军事威慑信号博弈模型(Military Deterrence Signaling Game Model,MDSGM)。将信号博弈理论和完美贝叶斯均衡思想引入MDSGM,探讨了均衡存在的类型和条件。算例表明,采用虚实结合、真假参杂的威慑信号传递方式,能达到"不战而屈人之兵"的目的,验证了模型的可行性和有效性,得出的结果能为决策者提供辅助参考。 Since argumentative domains are valuable, many military games are done continuously between relative countries. Methods taken by the deterrence patter are analyzed, the same as the counter- deterrence patter. Then the Military Deterrence Signaling Game Model (MDSGM) is built. The signaling game and perfect bayesian equilibrium are used to MDSGM, and the types and conditions of the equilibrium are discussed. The example shows that if actual and common deterrence signals are transferred synchronous, and the deterrence patter will own without battles. The reliability and feasibility of the model are validated, and some references are given to conductors.
出处 《火力与指挥控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期146-149,共4页 Fire Control & Command Control
基金 二炮装备科研基金资助项目(EP080154)
关键词 军事威慑 信号博弈 争议领域 均衡 military deterrence ,signaling game ,argumentative domain ,equilibrium
分类号 E9 [军事]
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1向钢华,王永县.当代西方基于博弈论方法的威慑理论综述[J].国外社会科学,2006(3):71-75. 被引量:8
  • 2Satoru T. Essays on Game Theory [M]. Byerly Hou Harvard University, 2007.
  • 3Zagare F. Reconciling Rationality with Deterrence: A Re-examination of the Logical Foundations of Deterrence Theory [J]. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2004, 16(2):23-35.
  • 4Stephen P B. Entry Deterrence and Signaling in a Nonrenewable Resource Model[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2001, 42(3):235-256.
  • 5James f. Selection Effects and Deterrence [J]. International Interaction, 2002, 28 (1) : 251-265.
  • 6Song T B,Cen W F,Zhang L X,et al. The Analyses of Strategic Deterrence Effect's Impact on Strategic Alliance's Decision-making Based on Horizontally Differentiated Product Market [C]//2006 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Services Computing, Guangdong, China, 2006.
  • 7王永县,向钢华.基于博弈分析的军事威慑理论研究[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,20(5):62-66. 被引量:6
  • 8向钢华,王永县.军事威逼博弈分析[J].运筹与管理,2010,19(1):5-8. 被引量:3
  • 9向钢华,王永县.一种三方不完全信息延伸威慑动态博弈模型[J].系统工程,2006,24(4):40-43. 被引量:9
  • 10黄涛.博弈论教程-理论.应用[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2005.

二级参考文献43

  • 1Thomas Schelling, Arms and Influence[ M ]. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1966.69-91.
  • 2Alexander L. George. Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to Wa [ M ]. Washington: Institute of Peace Press, 1991, "Preface".
  • 3Peter Viggo Jakobsen. Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy After the Cold War: a challenge for theory and practice [ M ]. New York : St. Martin's Press, 1998.2-3.
  • 4[美]朱·弗登博格,[法]让·梯若尔.《博弈论》[M].黄涛等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002,287.
  • 5詹姆斯·多尔蒂.《争论中的国际关系理论》[M].世界知识出版社,2003年版.第220页,第221页,第212页.
  • 6Kydd, Andrew, 2004, The Art of Shaker Modeling:Game Theory and Security Studies, in Sprinz and Wolinsky-Nahmias (eds.), Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations,Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • 7Neumann, Von & Morgenstem, 0., 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 8Brodie, Bernard (ed.), 1946, The Absolute Weapon : Atomic Power and World Order, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
  • 9Poundstone, William, 1992, Prisoner's Dilemma, New York: Random House.
  • 10Schelling, Thomas, 1960, The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

共引文献20

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部