期刊文献+

大学环境影响学习收获的自主参与模型解析——基于K大学调查的实证 被引量:17

Analysis of Engagement Model for the Environment of University Exerting an Influence on Learning-Gains:Based on a Survey of K University
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,社会对大学生培养质量的认可度与国家对高等教育支持力度的差距在不断拉大。因此,对大学生自主参与的研究成为了辨析大学环境与学生学习收获关系的良好途径。通过对K大学的调查建立起的结构方程模型,一方面显示了在参与过程中,学生可以经过接受外部动机的控制、学习过程中对参与的认可以及整合学校所提供的环境要素达到自身素质能力提高的目标;另一方面,学校可以获得学生参与层次不断递进后所产生的"杠杆"效应,可以更加清晰有效地对自身环境建设投入进行系统性的控制和决策,可以通过与学生参与的互动最终形成螺旋式上升的良性循环系统。 In our country, the sustentacular potency dimention of higher education is growing at express speed. But the approval degree of undergraduates" quality of educating is not satisfied with our society. The engagement of self--determination becomes a bridge between the college environment and the students" gains. On the one hand, in the system of student engagement, undergraduates can achieve the destination of improving his own competence across accepting the control of extrinsic motivation, the approval of engagement in study process, and integrated the resource of college. On the other hand, the college could make an observation and assessment for the engagement degree of undergraduate, and also obtain the effects of lever, which is produced by deepening of student engagement. College can control the input of environment construction systematically, and make decision clearly and effectively across the structure equation model This process will construct a virtuous circle system in upward spiral type.
出处 《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期39-44,共6页 Fudan Education Forum
基金 国家自然科学基金(70672027)
关键词 自我决定 参与 杠杆效应 决策优化 结构方程模型 Self-Determination Engagement Effects of Lever Decision-Optimization Structure Equation Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1PascarellaE. College Environmental Influences on Learning andCognitive Development : A Critical Review and synthesis [G]// SmartJ C (Ed.). Higher education: handbook of theory and research. NewYork: Agathon Press, 1985: 1-66.
  • 2AstinA W. Student Involvement: A Development Theory for HigherEducation [J].Journal of College student Development, 1999, 40(5):518-529.
  • 3DeciE L, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination inhuman behavior[M].New York: Plenum Publishing Co.,1985.
  • 4DeciE L. The relation of interest to motivation and human needs:The self-determination theory viewpoint [G]// Hoffmann L, Krapp A,Renninger K A,Baumert J (Eds). Interest and Learning. 1998:146-142.
  • 5Johande JagertGbolahan Gbadamosi. Specific remedy for specificproblem: measuring service quality in South African highereducation[J].Research in High Education, 2010, 60(3).
  • 6ChenPSD, Gonyea R M,Sarraf S A. Analyzing and InterpretingNSSE Data[J].New directions for institutional research, 2009(141).
  • 7PikeG R, Kuh G D. First - and Second -Generation CollegeStudents: A Comparison of Their Engagement and IntellectualDevelopment[J].The Journal of Higher Education, 2005, 76(3).
  • 8WebberK L,Hermanowicz J C,Lee K. A Structural Equation ModelExamining The Relationship Between Motivation, Perceptions of theCollege Environment, Quality of Effort, and Student Achievement inthe First Year of College [M].Relationship Between Motivation,Environment,Effort and Gains. Athens,2010.
  • 9CarleA C,Jaffee D, Vau^ian N W, Eder D. PsychometricProperties of Three New National Survey of Student EngagementBased Engagement Scales: An Item Response Theory Analysis [J].Research in High Education, 2009,50(8).
  • 10Deci E L,Koestner H, Ryan R M. The undermining effect is areality after all: Extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self -determination[J].Psychological Bulletin, 1999,125: 692-700.

同被引文献154

引证文献17

二级引证文献176

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部