期刊文献+

交通网络需求脆弱性分析及应用 被引量:3

Demand Vulnerability Analysis of Transportation Network and Its Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 异常事件的发生往往引起交通网络供给能力的降低,若忽略交通需求的变化,会对网络所受到影响的估计产生一定偏差.提出需求脆弱性概念,同时考虑异常事件下供给与需求的变化,以基于随机效用理论的需求组合模型和可达性指标作为脆弱性指标的基础,定量评估网络承受异常事件的能力.通过示例路网介绍了需求脆弱性指标的计算,并比较了几种方案对于降低需求脆弱性的效果,说明了需求脆弱性分析在交通规划与管理中的应用. Transportation network would be degraded under incident circumstance. If the change of demand side of the transportation system was not considered, the consequence of the incident would be overestimated. The demand vulnerability was proposed to evaluate the network's ability to resist incidents by considering both the supply and the demand side of the system. A combined travel demand model and an accessibility measure based on the random utility theory were applied as the basis of the demand vulnerability index. A trial network presented the calculation of the index and its application for comparison of management schemes. The demand vulnerability analysis could be helpful for the planners and managers to take measures to enhance the network's ability against incidents.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期1329-1332,1341,共5页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(70701027) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-08-0406)
关键词 交通网络 需求脆弱性 需求组合模型 可达性 transportation network demand vulnerability combined travel demand model accessibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1涂颖菲,杨超,陈小鸿.路网拓扑脆弱性及关键路段分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(3):364-367. 被引量:19
  • 2陈冬栋.面向城市路网脆弱性的交通事件影响研究[D].上海:同济大学交通运输工程学院,2011.
  • 3Nicholson A, Dalziell E. Risk evaluation and management: a road network reliability study[C]//The Network Reliability of Transport. Proceeding of the 1st International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR), New York: Pergamon, 2003: 45-59.
  • 4Bar-Gera H, Boyce D. Origin-based algorithms for combined travel forecasting models[J]. Transportation Research Part B. 2003, 37(5): 405.
  • 5Florian M, Wu J H, He S. A multi-class multi-mode variable demand network equilibrium model with hierarchical logit structures [C]//Transportation and Network Analysis.. Current Trends. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002: 119-133.
  • 6Lam W H K, Huang H J. A combined trip distribution and assignment model for multiple user classes[J]. Transportation Research Part B. 1992, 26(4): 275.
  • 7Safwat K N A, Magnanti T L. A combined trip generation, trip distribution, mode split, and trip assignment model[J]. Transportation Science. 1988, 22(1) : 14.
  • 8Oppenheim N. Urban travel demand modeling [M]. New York.. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , 1995.
  • 9喻翔,毛敏,刘建兵.城市交通需求预测组合模型的研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(1):75-79. 被引量:23
  • 10杜刚诚,彭国雄.交通组合模型在交通需求预测中的应用研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2004,28(1):92-94. 被引量:6

二级参考文献27

  • 1黄海军,顾昌耀.城市交通需求分析方法论的发展[J].中国公路学报,1995,8(2):31-37. 被引量:5
  • 2Ortuzar J D, Willumsen L D. Modeling transport[M]. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2001.
  • 3Oppenheim N. Urban travel demand modeling[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1995.
  • 4Garret M, Wachs M. Transportation planning on trial [M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996.
  • 5McNally M G. The activity-based approach, in handbook of transport mnodelling[M]. Oxford.. Pergamon, 2000 : 53 - 69.
  • 6Evans S. Derivation and analysis of some models for combining trip distribution and assignmentEJ]. Transportation Research, 1976,10(1) :37.
  • 7Florian M,Nguyen S. A combined trip distribution model split and trip assignment model[J]. Transportation Research, 1978, 12(4) :241.
  • 8Boyce D, Chon K S, Lee Y J, et al. Implementation and computational issues for combined models of location, destination, mode, and route choice [J]. Environment and Planning A, 1983,15 (9) : 1219.
  • 9Safwat K N A, Magnanti T L. A combined trip generation, trip distribution, mode split, and trip assignment model[J]. Transportation Science, 1988,22 (1) : 14.
  • 10Lam W H K, Huang H J. A combined trip distribution and assignment model for mulitple user classes[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1992,26(4) : 275.

共引文献48

同被引文献45

  • 1杜倩倩.道路网络脆弱性分析及应用[D].杭州:浙江大学,2011.
  • 2Berdica K.An introduction to road vulnerability:what has been done,is done and should be done[J].Transport Policy,2002,9 (2).
  • 3Husdal J.Reliability and vulnerability versus costs and benefits[A].The European Transport Conference[C].2004.
  • 4G M D'Este,M A P Taylor.Modelling network vulnerability at the level of the national strategic transport network[R].Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for transportation studies,2001,4 (2).
  • 5M A P Taylor,G M D'Este.Concepts of network vulnerability and applications to the identification of critical elements of transport infrastructure[R].New Zealand Transport Research Forum,2003.
  • 6Jenelius E,T Petersen,L G Mattsson.Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis[J].Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice,2006,40(7).
  • 7Erath A,Birdsall J,Axhausen K W,et al.Vulnerability assessment methodology for Swiss road network[J].Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2009,2137(1).
  • 8Quium A,S A Hoque.The completeness and vulnerability of road network in Bangladesh[R].Engineering Concerns of Flood,2002.
  • 9Yingfei T,Y Chao,C Xiaohong.Methodology for evaluating and improving road network topology vulnerability[A].Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation[C].2010.
  • 10Latora V,M Marchiori.A measure of centrality based on network efficiency[J].New Journal of Physics,2007,9(6).

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部