期刊文献+

美国反就业歧视立法及其借鉴意义 被引量:3

On Legislation of Anti-discrimination in Employment in USA and its Significance to China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国制定了完善的反就业歧视法律体系,对就业歧视的概念、类型及认定标准作了清晰界定,相对合理地划分了劳资双方各自的举证责任,并设立了反就业歧视的专门机构,为劳动者提供了方便的救济途径。这些都是我国反就业歧视法律需要借鉴的地方。但是在差别对待歧视案件中,美国法律要求证明雇主的歧视动机,在一定程度上降低了反就业歧视的效果,我国法律在就业歧视的认定上应采用客观标准。 The United States has worked out a perfect anti-discrimination employment law system which clearly de- fined the concept, the types and the judging standards of discrimination in employment, divided the burden of proof between labor and management, and established a specialized agency to provide a convenient relieve approach for workers. The legislation of anti-discrimination in employment in China needs to learn a lot from USA. However, the law in USA asks for providing the employers' discriminatory motive when we treat the discrimination cases to re- duce the effectiveness of the anti- discrimination law to a certain extent. So, China should adapt an objective criteria in Identify employment discrimination.
作者 刘廷华
出处 《河北工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第3期61-65,共5页 Journal of Hebei University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 就业歧视 认定标准 举证责任 救济 employment discrimination criteria burden of proof relief
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1谢增毅.美英两国就业歧视构成要件比较--兼论反就业歧视法发展趋势及我国立法选择[J].中外法学,2008,20(4):613-629. 被引量:38
  • 2RobertBelton, DianneAvery, MariaL. Ontiveros, Roberto L. Corrada, Employment Discrimination Law: Cases and Materials on Equality in the Workplace ( Seventh Edition ) [M]. NewYork: The Labor Law Group , 2004: 227-228.
  • 3Anne Peters. Women, quotas and Constitutions: A comparative study of Affirmative Action For Women under American, Ger- man, EC and International Law [M]. Leiden: Kluwer Law International, 1999: 31.
  • 4Terry H, Anderson. The Pursuit ofFaimess: A History of Af- firmative Action [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc. 2004: 103.

二级参考文献104

  • 1Home Department, Racial Discrimination, 1975, Cmnd. 6234, at 3.
  • 2Home Department, Racial Discrimination, 1975, Cmnd. 6234, at 6.
  • 3Section703(k) (2), 706(e)(2),(g)(1).
  • 4Section 703 (a) (1) (2), Title Ⅶ of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • 5Linda Hamilton Krieger, The Content of our Categories: a Cognitive Bias Approach to Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity, Stanford Law Review, July 1995, p. 1168.
  • 6Melissa Hart, Subjective Decision and Unconscious Discrimination, Alabama Law Review, Spring 2005, p. 750.
  • 7Linda Hamilton Krieger, The Content of our Categories: a Cognitive Bias Approach to Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity, Stanford Law Review, July 1995, p. 1164.
  • 8Ann C. McGinley, Viva la Evolucion! : Recognizing Unconscious Motivation in Title VII, 9 Cornell J. L. & Pub. Pol'y., p. 418 (2000).
  • 9Susan Sturm, Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 101 -458. 2001. pp. 465 -466.
  • 10Susan Sturm, Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 101:458, 2001, pp. 468-469.

共引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部