期刊文献+

人民币汇率补贴论:美国贸易堡垒的新借口——以美国《汇率改革促进公平贸易法案》为视角

Subsidies on RMB Exchange Rate: New Pretext of the U.S. Trade Barriers——From the Perspective of the U.S. Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国《汇率改革促进公平贸易法案》(编号H.R.2 378,以下简称H.R.2 378法案)的出台已引起中国的强烈反对。该法案针对中国汇率政策,将在特定条件下把所谓"人民币低估"行为视为《补贴与反补贴措施协定》中的出口补贴。但根据世界贸易组织的相关规定和案例,人民币汇率并不构成出口补贴,美国拟采取贸易措施对中国输美产品进行征税,不但于法无据,而且违反非歧视原则,与《补贴与反补贴措施协议》倡导的公平贸易的精神背道而驰,可能引致国际贸易争端,构建新的贸易壁垒。文章对此进行分析,并提出我国应对策略。 The United States Currency Rreform or Fair Trade Act ( numbers H. R. 2 378, H. R. 2 378 of the following abbre- viation bill ) introduced has aroused strong opposition from China. The bill aimed at China' s exchange rate policy, will be under certain conditions, the so-called "undervalued" acts as Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures of export subsidies. But according to the rules and cases of World Trade Organization , the RMB exchange rate does not constitute the export subsi- dies, the United States will take measures to trade on China' s exports to America taxes, not only no legal basis, and in violation of the principle of non-discrimination, and Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures advocate fair trade spirit draw fur- ther apart, may lead to international trade disputes, construction of new trade barriers. The article undertakes an analysis to this, put forward our country' s coping strategies.
作者 唐全民
出处 《湖南人文科技学院学报》 2012年第4期36-39,共4页 Journal of Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology
基金 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目"湖南省国际贸易摩擦法律对策研究"(11C0712)
关键词 出口补贴 贸易壁垒 非歧视原则 应对策略 export subsidies barriers to trade the principle of non-discrimination coping countermeasures
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献7

  • 1Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 177-78, 117 S.Ct. 1154, 137 L.Ed.2d 281 (1997)o.
  • 2"Standard steel fasteners in the PRC receive countervailable subsidies." Initiation Notice, 74 Fed.Reg. at 5Id. at 54,545-46.
  • 3Certain Standard Steel Fasteners From China and Taiwan, Investigation Nos. 701-TA472 and -731- TA- 1171- 1172 (Preliminary), U.S. International Trade Commission (November 2009) ("ITC Preliminary Determination ") at 29.
  • 4United States Court of International Trade. NUCOR FASTENER DIVISION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and XL Screw Corporation, et al., Defendant Intervenors. Court No. 09 00534. Oct. 22, 2010.
  • 5Nat' l Park Hospitality Ass' n v. Dep' t of the Interior, 538 U.S. 803, (2003).
  • 6Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States, 529 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir.2008)o.
  • 7韩龙.人民币汇率补贴论:基于WTO补贴构成条件的审视[J].中外法学,2009,21(3):411-426. 被引量:18

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部