期刊文献+

两种多克隆刺激条件下人诱导性Treg表型的多样性变化 被引量:2

Plasticity of human induced regulatory T cells during two different polyclonal stimulations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究人诱导性调节性T细胞(iTreg)细胞表型的多样性变化,并比较PMA/Ionomycin和PHA两种多克隆刺激对人iTreg的诱导的异同。方法:用Ficoll密度梯度离心分离出人PBMC,空白对照组直接检测,其余则在细胞培养液(非刺激对照组)、PMA/Ionomycin溶液(PMA/Ionomycin刺激组)或PHA溶液(PHA刺激组)中培养16小时,以流式细胞仪检测CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127-、CD4+CD25+FoxP3+IL-2-、CD4+CD25+FoxP3+IL-10+、CD4+CD25+FoxP3+TGF-β+和CD4+CD25+FoxP3+IFN-γ+的表达。结果:空白对照组显示,约4%的CD4+细胞表达CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127-,即nTreg。PBMC在细胞培养液培养16个小时,iTreg的表达无明显变化,但经多克隆刺激后,各不同细胞表型的iTreg的表达明显上升(均P<0.01),表明多克隆刺激可以明显诱导人iTreg的产生。PHA对IL-2-和TGF-β+iTreg的诱导比PMA/Ionomycin强(P<0.01),但仅PMA/Ionomycin可以诱导产生CD4+CD25+FoxP3+IFN-γ+iTreg,而PHA不能诱导。刺激后产生的CD4+FoxP3+IFN-γ+PBL表达与CD25水平呈逆相关。结论:多克隆刺激可以诱导产生人iTreg,PMA/Ionomycin和PHA对人iTreg诱导的机制和程度不一样。多克隆刺激后产生的不同细胞表型反映了人iTreg的多样性变化。 Objective:To investigate the plasticity of human induced regulatory T cell(iTreg) phenotypes during polyclonal stimulation by comparing the difference between PMA/Ionomycin and PHA stimulation to the in-vitro induction of human iTreg.Methods:Human PBMC were isolated from human peripheral blood using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation.Human PBMC were incubated in cell culture medium with or without PMA/Ionomycin or PHA.Phenotypes of iTreg were analyzed 0 h and 16 h after initiation of cell culture using four-color fluorescence flow cytometry.Results:In freshly isolated PBMC,approximate 4% CD4+ T cells expressed CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127-,which were regarded as nTreg.The proportion remained stable after 16 h incubation in culture medium,whereas increased strongly during polyclonal stimulation(P0.01).CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ iTreg co-expressing IL-2-,IL-10+,or TGF-β+ were induced either during 16 h PMA/Ionomycin or PHA stimulation(all P0.01),whereas CD4+CD25+FoxP3+IFN-γ+ iTreg can only be induced by PMA/Ionomycin stimulation(P0.01) but not PHA stimulation(P=n.s.).Interestingly,expression of IL-2-iTreg after PHA stimulation were higher than it after PMA/Ionomycin stimulation,similar as of TGF-β+ iTreg(all P0.01).Expression of CD4+FoxP3+IFN-γ+ iTreg after PMA/Ionomycin stimulation decreased with CD25 expression.Conclusion:Human iTreg could be induced during polyclonal stimulation in-vitro.PMA/Ionomycin and PHA have different mechanisms and pathway for the induction of Treg.The induction of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ iTreg subsets co-expressing IL-2-,IL-10+,TGF-β+,or IFN-γ+ during polyclonal stimulation shows the plasticity of human iTreg phenotypes.
出处 《中国免疫学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期769-774,778,共7页 Chinese Journal of Immunology
基金 国家自然科学基金课题(No.81000739)
关键词 人诱导性调节性T细胞 细胞表型 多克隆刺激 细胞因子 Human induced Treg Phenotypes Polyclonal stimulation Cytokines
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Sakaguchi S, Wing K, Onishi Y et al. Regulatory T cells: how do they suppress immune responses? [J]. [nt Immunol, 2009; 21: 1105-1111.
  • 2NomtJra T, Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising CD25 + CD4 + regulatory T cells in tumor immunity [ J ]. Curr Top Microbiol lmmunol, 2005 ; 293:287-302.
  • 3Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells: key controllers of immunologic self- tolerance[J]. Cell, 2000 ; 101 :455-458.
  • 4Bluestone J A, Abbas A K. Natural versus adaptive regulatory T cells [J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2003; 3:253-257.
  • 5Sakaguehi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M et al. Immunologic self-toler- ance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha- chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases [ J ]. J lmmunol, 1995 ; 155 : 1151-1164.
  • 6Takahashi T, Kuniyasu Y, Toda Met al. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25 + CD4 + naturally anergic and suppressive T cells : induction of autoimmune disease by breaking their anergic/sup- pressive state [ J ]. Int Immunol, 1998 ; 10 : 1969-1980.
  • 7Baecher-Allan C, Brown J A, Freeman G J et al. CD4+ CD25hish regulatory cells in human peripheral blood [ J ]. J Immunol, 2001; 167 : 1245-1253.
  • 8Wang Z, Fu X Y, Shi B Yet al. Antigen-specific suppression by in- duced CD4 + CD25high regulatory T cells in kidney recipients [ J ]. Transplant Proc, 2009 ; 41 : 1574-1576.
  • 9Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell develop- ment by the transcription factor Foxp3 [ J ]. Science, 2003 ; 299 : 1057-1061.
  • 10Fontenot J D, Gavin M A, Rudensky A Y. Foxp3 programs the de- velopment and function of CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T ceils [ J]. Nat Immunol, 2003 ; 4:330-336.

同被引文献27

  • 1Sakaguchi S, Miyara M, Costantino CM.et aI.FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat Rev Immunol.2010;10(7):490-500.
  • 2Sakaguchi S, Powrie F.Emerging challenges in regulatory T cell function and biology. Science.2007;317(5838):627-629.
  • 3Sakaguchi S, Wing K, Yamaguchi T.Dynamics of peripheral tolerance and immune regulation mediated by Treg.Eur J Imrnunol.2009~ 39(9):2331-2336.
  • 4Jones E, Dahm-Vicker M, Golgher D,et aI.CD25+ regulatory T cells and tumor immunity. Immunol Lett.2003;85(2):141-143.
  • 5Adeegbe D, BayerAL, Levy RB,et al.Cutting edge: allogeneic CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T regulatory cells suppress autoimmunity while establishing transplantation tolerance. J Irnmunol.2006;176(12):7149-7153.
  • 6Bluestone JA, Abbas AK. Natural versus adaptive regulatory T cells. Nat Rev Immunol.2003;3(3):253-257.
  • 7Cassis L, Aiello S, Noris M.Natural versus adaptive regulatory T cells. Contrib Nephrol.2005;146:121-131.
  • 8Sakaguchi S. The origin of FOXP3-expressing CD4* regulatory T cells: thymus or periphery. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112(9):1310-1312.
  • 9Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M,et al.lmmunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoirnmune diseases. J Immunol.1995;155(3):1151-1164.
  • 10Baecher-Allan C, Brown JA, Freeman GJ,et aI.CD4+CD25 high regulatory cells in human peripheral blood. J Immunol. 2001 ;167(3):1245-1253.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部