7BLACK J W. Multiple-choice Intelligibility Tests [J]. J. Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1957(22) : 213 -235.
8MULLENNIX J W, PISONI D B, MARTIN C S. Some Effects of Talker Variability on Spoken Word Recognition [ J ]. J. Aeoust. Soc. Am. , 1989 (85) : 365 -378.
9NYGAARD L C, SOMMERS M S, PISONI D B. Effects of Stimulus Variability on Perception and Representation of Spoken Words in Memory [ J ]. Perception and Psychophysics, 1995 (57) : 989 - 1001.
10PICHENY M A, DURLACH N I, BRAIDA L D. Speaking Clearly for the Hard of Hearing I : Intelligibility Differences Between Clear and Conversational speech [J]. J. Speech and Hearing Research, 1985 (28) : 96 -103.
2Nabelek AK, Tucker FM,Leowski TR. Toleration of back- ground noises: Relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons [J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1991, 34: 679.
3Nabelek AK, Tampas JW, Burchfield SB. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background in aided and unaided conditions [J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res,2004,47:1001.
4Nabelek AK, Freyaldenhoven MC, Tampas JW, et al. Ac- ceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use [J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2006, 17: 626.
5Adams EM, Gordon-Hickey S, Moore RE, et al . Effects of reverberation on acceptable noise level measurements in youn- ger and older adults[J]. Int J Audiol, 2010,49:832.
6Nichols AC, Hickey SG. The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing[J]. Inter J Audiol, 2012,51 : 353.
