期刊文献+

产业结构变动对生态效益影响的实证分析 被引量:4

The Impact of Industrial Structure Change on Ecological Efficiency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以能源消耗强度和污染排放强度两个指标来代表生态效益,应用直接因素分解法和Divisia因素分解法,对我国2002-2007年期间产业结构变动对生态效益的贡献度测算的结果表明,我国这期间的技术进步对生态效益成正的影响,但这种正的影响却被产业结构变动对生态效益的负效应所抵消。因此,节能减排目标的实现,不仅要靠技术进步,还要对产业结构进行优化调整。 The article uses energy consumption intensity and pollution emission intensity as the ecological efficiency,and computes the contribution degree of industrial structure change to the energy consumption intensity and pollution emission intensity between 2002 and 2007 by direct factor decomposition method and Divisia factor decomposition method.The results show that: the industrial structure change makes a negative effect to energy consumption intensity and pollution emission intensity.So,for the purpose of energy saving and emission reduction,we should not only depend on technology progress,but also on industrial structure adjustment.
作者 贺丹 赵玉林
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2012年第5期694-698,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 中央财政自主创新基金(2011-1b-079) 国家社会科学基金重点项目(11AZD081)
关键词 产业结构 能源消耗强度 污染排放强度 生态效益 industrial structure energy consumption intensity pollution emission intensity ecological efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Robert E Lucas Jr. Making a miracle[J]. Econo- metrica, 1993(5) 2517272.
  • 2Nelson R R,Pack H. The asian miracle and modern growth theory[J]. The Economic Journal, 1999 (7) .. 416-436.
  • 3张军,陈诗一,Gary H. Jefferson.结构改革与中国工业增长[J].经济研究,2009,44(7):4-20. 被引量:307
  • 4Han Xiaoli , Lakshmanan T K. Structural changes and energy consumption in the japanese economy 1975 -- 85 : An Input-- Output Analysis [J]. Energy Journal, 1994(3) : 165-188.
  • 5Brock W, Taylor M S. Economic growth and the environment[M]. Aghion P, Durlauf, S, ed. Hand- book of Economic Growth II. Chap. 28, Elsevier, 2005:1749-1821.
  • 6Kahrl Fredrich, David Roland-Hoist. Growth and structural change in china's energy economy[J]. Energy,2009(7) :894-903.
  • 7Jorgenson D W , Kevin J. Strioh U S. Economic growth at the Industry level [J]. American Eco- nomic Review. (Paper and Proceedings), 2000 (5) 161-167.
  • 8Alcantara Vicent,Rosa Duarte. Comparison of ener- gy intensities in european union countries, results of a structural decomposition analysis[J]. Energy Poli- cy, 2004(2) : 177-189.
  • 9Zhang Zhongxiang. Why did the energy intensity fall in china's industrial sector in the 1990s? [J]. Energy Economics, 2003 (25) :625-638.
  • 10Zhang M, Mu H,Ning Y,et al. Decomposition of enerey related CO2 emission over 1991-2006 in China[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009 (7) = 2122- 2128.

二级参考文献61

  • 1涂正革,肖耿.中国的工业生产力革命——用随机前沿生产模型对中国大中型工业企业全要素生产率增长的分解及分析[J].经济研究,2005,40(3):4-15. 被引量:443
  • 2陈勇,李小平.中国工业行业的面板数据构造及资本深化评估:1985~2003[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(10):57-68. 被引量:89
  • 3李小平,卢现祥.中国制造业的结构变动和生产率增长[J].世界经济,2007,30(5):52-64. 被引量:151
  • 4.《中国统计年鉴》[M].,1983.323页.
  • 5Akkemik K. Ali, 2005, "Labor Productivity and Inter-Sectoral Reallocation of Labor in Singapore ( 1965-2002)", Forum of International Development Studies, 30.
  • 6Bai Chong-En, Jiangyong Lu and Zhigang Tao, 2008, "How Does Privatization Work in China?" Journal of Comparative Economics, in Press.
  • 7Battese G.E. and T. J. Coelli, 1992, "Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India", Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169.
  • 8Berthelemy Jean-Claude, 2001, "The Role of Capital Accumulation, Adjustment and Structural Change for Economic Take-Off Empirical Evidence from African Growth Episodes", World Development, 29, 323-343.
  • 9Bhaumik Suman Kumar and Saul Estfin, 2007, "How Transition Paths Differ: Enterprise Performance in Russia and China", Journal of Development Economics, 82(2), 374-392.
  • 10Bosworth Barry and Susan M. Collins, 2008, "Accounting for Growth: Comparing China and India", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22 (1), 45-66.

共引文献306

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部