期刊文献+

Modeling Biodiversity Benefits and External Costs from a Keystone Predator Reintroduction Policy

Modeling Biodiversity Benefits and External Costs from a Keystone Predator Reintroduction Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this paper, an economic model was constructed to determine the optimal wolf population and distribution across the Northern Rocky Mountains. Both ecological and economic concepts were incorporated in an implicitly spatial social welfare maximization problem. This interdisciplinary model relies on multiple data sources, including current wolf population and distribution information, opportunity cost to local landowners, and contingent valuation studies to determine willingness-to-pay for wolves. Economic models tend to externalize ecological concerns and ecological models often omit the complex human dimensions of conservation policy. Accordingly, this model can serve as a guide for integrating best practices from both fields. The model presented here is sufficiently general to apply to wolves in other ecosystems and to other highly interacting species such as beavers and bison. The Northern Rocky Mountain wolf was used as an example of how this economic model works, but this model can be applied far more broadly.
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2012年第3期385-394,共10页 山地科学学报(英文)
关键词 WOLF ECONOMICS BIODIVERSITY Ecological economics Opportunity cost Conservationpolicy Endangered species 生物多样性 外部成本 捕食者 经济模型 放归 建模 效益 种群数量
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Bangs EE, Fritts SH, Fontaine JA, et al. (1998) Status of gray wolf restoration in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 785-798.
  • 2Bergstrom BJ, Vignieri S, et al. (2009) The Northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf is not yet recovered. Bioscience 59: 991-999.
  • 3Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2010) Recovering riparian plant communities with wolves in Northern Yellowstone, USA. Restoration Ecology 18: 380-389.
  • 4Bulte E, Rondeau D (2007) Compensation for wildlife damages: Habitat conversion, species preservation and local welfare. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54: 311-322.
  • 5Byron E (2010) With wolves entrenched, debate has shifted. Billings Gazette. http://www.billingsgazette.com/news/ stateandregional/montana/ article_53ba4dee-f82d-nde-8345 -o01cc4c03286.html [accessed on 2010-5-21].
  • 6Chambers CM, Whitehead JC (2003) A contingent valuation estimate of the benefits of wolves in Minnesota. Environmental and Resource Economics 26:249-267.
  • 7Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar (2010) Nos. CV 09-77-M-DWM, CV 09-82-M-DWM, 2010 WL 3084194 (D. Mont. Aug. 5, 2010).
  • 8Duffield JW, Neher CJ (1996) Economics of wolf recovery in Yellowstone National Park. Transactions of the 61st North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, pp 285-292.
  • 9Dyar JA, Wagner J (2003) Uncertainty and species recovery program design. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 505-522.
  • 10Eisenberg C (2010) The Wolfs Tooth: Keystone Predators, Trophic Cascades, and Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部