期刊文献+

早发型重度子痫前期期待治疗的综合权衡

Balanced analysis of expectant treatment of early-onset severe preeclampsia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对不同孕周入院的早发型重度子痫前期患者行期待治疗的母儿双方作用进行综合权衡,探讨不同孕周患者行期待治疗时的把握倾向。方法回顾分析我院2008年7月~2011年6月收治的128例早发型重度子痫前期患者临床治疗的情况。按照入院孕周分为三组,A组:<29周27例,B组:29~31+6周49例,C组:32~33+6周52例。比较不同孕周入院患者接受期待治疗至终止妊娠的时长、期间孕产妇并发症的发生情况、围产儿不良结局情况,分析不同孕周患者行期待治疗对母儿状况的正面和负面作用,综合权衡两方。结果三组孕产妇期待治疗至终止妊娠的时长以B组为最长,A组次之,C组最短;A、B组孕妇并发症发生率差异无统计学意义,P>0.05,C组与A、B组差异有统计学意义,P<0.05;三组围产儿结局以C组为最佳,B组次之,A组最差,围产儿不良结局率差异有统计学意义P<0.05。结论经比较权衡不同孕周早发型重度子痫前期患者期待治疗对孕妇造成的负面作用和给围产儿带来的正面效果,不同孕周患者在采取期待治疗时在把握倾向上应有所侧重:对于<29周的患者,负面作用严重时宜倾向于放弃期待治疗;对于>29周的患者,期待治疗的正面效果使得尽可能延长孕周的治疗方案成为相对可取;对于32~34周的患者,主动选择提前终止妊娠的做法使改善围产儿结局的潜力没有得到充分挖掘,在条件允许的情况下,宜于坚持期待治疗直至终止妊娠的客观指征出现。 Objective To analyze both maternal and fetal effects of expectant treatment of early-onset severe preeclamp- sia, and discuss recommendable treatment choices based on the balance of both effects. Methods To review the 128 cases of ear- ly-onset severe preeclamosia treated in our hospital from July 2008 to June 2011, divided into three groups according to gestation weeks when hospitalized: Group A with 27 cases less than 29 weeks, Group B with 49 cases of 29 -31 +6 weeks, Group C with 52 cases of 32 - 34 weeks. Results Group B had the longest average treatment time while Group A shorter and Group C the shor- test; pregnancy complieations ratio of Group C is significandy different (P 〈 0. 05 ) from Groups A and B, whereas no significant difference ( P 〉 0.05 ) between Groups A and B ; and the poor perinatal outcome ratios are significantly different ( P 〈 0. 05 ) a- mong the three groups, with Group C the best and Group B poorer and Group A the poorest. Conclusion On balanced considera- tion, patients of less than 29 gestation weeks, when afflicted with pregnancy complications, might advisably choose to terminate pregnancy, while those of 29 -31 +6 weeks might choose to stay on expectant treatment for longer gestation time and better perina- tat outcome, mnd those of 32 - 34 weeks should make more efforts to prolong gestation time to further improve the perinatal out- come.
作者 刘毅 何丽
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2012年第9期1564-1567,共4页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 早发型重度子痫前期 期待治疗 并发症 围产儿预后 early-onset severe preeelampsia expectant treatment prenancy complications perinatal outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1杨孜.早发型重度先兆子痫——产科医师面临的挑战[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2003,4(2):83-84. 被引量:125
  • 2石凌懿,杨孜,郭艳军,王伽略,王丽娜,叶蓉华,黄萍.重度子癇前期早产与自发性早产临床对比分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2005,21(11):663-667. 被引量:14
  • 3杨孜,王伽略,黄萍,石凌懿,李蓉,叶蓉华,陈蕾.重度子癎前期终末器官受累不平行性及其围产结局探讨[J].中华围产医学杂志,2006,9(1):10-14. 被引量:109
  • 4Withagen M, Wallenburg H, Steegers, et al. Morbidity and development in childhood of infants born after temporizing treatment of early onset pre-eclampsia [J]. BJOG, 2005, 112(7): 910-914.
  • 5Hall H J, Odendaal DW. Delivery of patients with early onset,severe pre-eclampsia [J]. BJOG, 2001, 74(2): 143-150.
  • 6Wessel G, Annelies R, Gouke J, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two temporizing management strategies, one with and one without plasma volume expansion, for severe and early onset pre-eclampsia [J]. BJOG, 2005, 1t2(10): 1358-1368.
  • 7Witlin AG, Saade GR, Mattar F, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in women with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia between 24 and 33 weeks' gestation[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 182(3) : 607-611.
  • 8[1]Witlin AG,Saade GR,Mattar F,et al.Predictors of neonatal outcome in woman with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia between 24 and 33 weeks' gestation.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2000,182:607-611.
  • 9[2]Owen J,Baker SL,Hauth JC,et al.Is indicated or spontaneous preterm delivery more advantageous for the fetus? Am J Obstet Gynecol,1990,163:868-872.
  • 10[3]Ananth CV,Savitz DA,Luther ER,et al.Preeclampsia and preterm birth subtypes in Nova Scotia,1986 to 1992.Am J Perinatol,1997,14:17-23.

共引文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部