摘要
阅读和写作是相互关联又彼此独立的两种语言活动,通过读写结合提高学生语文素养的实验从未停息过。中关两国读写结合路径在理论基础上的差异表现为,中国以文章学作为基础,美国以语言学和认知心理学作为理论基础;结合路径类型上的差异表现为,中国重视写作要素,而美国更注重建立读写联系和修辞;路径结合点上的差异表现为,中国注重显性要素,而美国注重显性要素的同时兼顾隐性要素。比较中关两国读写结合路径,有利于我国读写结合扬长避短,为读写结合提供新思路。
Reading and writing are two activities related with, and independent from each other. The experiments for the improvement of students' language proficiency never have a stop. The differences of approaches of integrating reading and writing are as follows= the integration approaches in China take article science as theoretical base, while those in America are based on linguistics and cognitive psychology; China emphasizes writing while America attaches more importance to the relation between reading and writing, as well as rhetoric; China stresses explicit factors while America take both explicit and implicit factors into consideration. The comparative study of approaches of integrating reading and writing in China and America can provide a new sight for the integration of reading and writing in our country.
出处
《课程.教材.教法》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第10期116-120,共5页
Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金
安徽省教育厅人文社科一般规划项目“传统的遗失与拾遗——中国儿童传统文化认同研究”(2010SK159)
国家“211”工程三期重点学科建设项目“基础教育课程改革深化与教学创新研究”的成果之一
关键词
读写结合
理论基础
路径建构
the integration of reading and writing
theoretical basis
construction of approaches