期刊文献+

治疗—对照差的临床意义及其判别方法 被引量:2

Clinical Significance of TreatmentControl Difference and its Discriminating Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 说明治疗—对照差的临床意义及其判别方法 ,为此提出一种非虚假设检验。方法 以同源有效样本量取代样本量 ,将用于比较两率差和最小临床承认疗效差量的经典非虚假设检验加以扩展以覆盖终检。结果 这种检验可用于实现这种判别。在无终检时 ,它还原为经典检验。结论 与通常的药物疗效评价方法相比 ,这显然提高了一步。 Objective To explain the clinical significance of the treatmentcontrol difference and its discriminating approach and propose a test of non-null hypothesis for it. Methods The classical test of non-null hypothesis for comparing the difference of two rates with the minimal clinically relevant the rapeutic difference is generalized so as to cover censorship by means of using the homogenetic effective sample size in place of sample size. Results The test can be used for realizing the discrimination. It reduces to its classical counterpart when there is no censoring. Conclusion This is a remarkable progress by contrast with the usual methods in the clinical evaluation of drugs.
出处 《中国医院统计》 2000年第2期82-84,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics
关键词 终检 四分结果模式 治疗-对照差 生存率 Censorship Minimal clinically relevant the rapeutic difference Quadripartite-resulted modality Survival rate Test of non-null hypothesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

共引文献5

同被引文献9

  • 1赵国龙,王美霞,周灵杰,熊诗松,买凯.最小临床承认疗效差量和四分结果模式[J].数理医药学杂志,1994,7(1):37-41. 被引量:6
  • 2赵国龙,王曙炎,王美霞,周灵杰,赵敏,刘欣,熊诗松,买凯.药物疗效评价的四分结果模式及临床应用[J].药物流行病学杂志,1995,4(2):110-113. 被引量:4
  • 3赵国龙.基于同源性生存率方差的生存率推断[J].数理统计与应用概率,1992,7(3):280-289.
  • 4Dunnett CW, Gent M. Significance testing to establish equivalence between treatments, with special reference to data in the form of 2×2 tables. Biometrics, 1977,33(4):593~602
  • 5Lachin JM. Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1981,2:93~113
  • 6Halperin M, Rogot E, Gurian J, et al. Sample sizes for medical trials with special reference to long-term therapy. J Chron Dis, 1968,21:13~24
  • 7Sahai H, Khurshid A. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review. Statistics in Medicine, 1996,15(1):1~21
  • 8Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.221~229
  • 9赵国龙,侯超娅.药物疗效评价的功效分析方法和功效表[J].中国医院统计,1999,6(3):140-143. 被引量:3

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部