期刊文献+

结构现实主义外交政策理论的构建与拓展——兼论对理解中国外交政策的启示 被引量:7

The Development and Extension of Structural Realist Foreign Policy Theory and Considerations for Understanding Chinese Foreign Policy
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于当下外交政策研究领域所呈现出的理论有效供给不足的局面,国际关系理论界围绕外交政策能否建立简约系统的理论以及结构现实主义外交政策理论是否可行展开了争论。本文对既有争论进行了回顾和梳理,剖析了结构现实主义外交政策理论的必要性与可行性。在此基础上,深入评估了进攻性现实主义、防御性现实主义与新古典现实主义等现实主义理论分支在外交政策理论探索中的进展与不足。同时,本文对结构现实主义外交政策理论的拓展进行了尝试,试图开拓出更加纯粹、有力的理论发展路径,完善结构现实主义外交政策理论的解释力。最后,运用结构现实主义外交政策理论剖析了中国外交存在的规律性现象,并剖析了其在未来外交政策构建中可能得到的体现与拓展。 The present deficit of effective theories of foreign policy,has led scholars of international relations theory to debate whether crafting simple and systematic theories of foreign policy is possible,and whether such theories stemming from structural realism are tenable.This article provides an in-depth assessment of both progress and gaps in the literature on foreign policy theory stemming from perspectives of offensive realism,defensive realism,neo-classical realism and other realist schools of thought.The article continues by attempting to develop a simple yet powerful theory which can enhance the explanatory power of structural realist theories of foreign policy.In closing,the article applies structural realist foreign policy theory to explain patterns in Chinese diplomacy and to illustrate the prospects for applying such theories to future foreign policy efforts.
作者 陈小鼎 刘丰
出处 《当代亚太》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期56-79,158,共24页 Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
基金 "兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"(项目编号:11LZUJBWZY001)的资助
关键词 结构现实主义外交政策理论 防御性现实主义 进攻性现实主义 新古典现实主义 中国外交政策 Structural Realist Theories of Foreign Policy Defensive Realism Offensive Realism Neo-Classical Realism Chinese Foreign Policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献67

  • 1Walter Carlsnaes, "Foreign Policy", in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons, eds, Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage Publications, 2002, pp. 331-332.
  • 2Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979, p. 72.
  • 3James Fearon, "Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International Relations", Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 1, 1998, pp. 289-313.
  • 4Robert Putnam, "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games", Inter national Organization, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1988, pp. 427-460.
  • 5James Rosenau, The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, New York: Nicholas Publishing Company, 1980.
  • 6Graham Allison, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Bos ton: Little, Brown, 1971.
  • 7Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Prineeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 8James Rosenau, "Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy", in James Rosenau, The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, pp. 115-168.
  • 9陈小鼎.国际关系研究层次的上升与回落[J].世界经济与政治,2008(7):48-51. 被引量:14
  • 10Colin Elman, "Why Not a Neorealist Theory of Foreign Policy?" Security Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1996, pp. 34-37.

二级参考文献174

共引文献169

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部