期刊文献+

益生菌对溃疡性结肠炎疗效的影响 被引量:9

Study on clinical efficacy of probiotics on ulcerative colitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价益生菌对溃疡性结肠炎的临床疗效。方法选择60例轻中度溃疡性结肠炎患者,随机分成治疗组和对照组,治疗组应用嗜酸乳杆菌颗粒制剂(乐托尔)联合美沙拉嗪,对照组单用美沙拉嗪,治疗8周,8周后统计临床疗效并对比血清C反应蛋白变化。结果治疗组总有效率(93.3%)高于对照组(83.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组8周后血清C-反应蛋白下降幅度(7.46±3.51 mg/L)明显高于对照组(4.62±2.09 mg/L),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在轻中度溃疡性结肠炎治疗中,联合应用乐托尔比单用美沙拉嗪治疗临床疗效好。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of probiotics in treatment of ulcerative colitis.Methods A total of 60 patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis were randomly allocated into trial group and control group.Patients in trial group were given with 5-ASA and Lactobacillus.Patients in control group only received 5-ASA.The therapeutic course lasted for 8 weeks.The clinical efficacy and serum level of C-reactive protein were measured before and after treatment.Results After 8 weeks,the total efficacy(93.3%) of patients in trial group was significantly better than that of patients in control group(83.3%) and the decrease in serum level of C-reactive protein in patients of trial group(7.46 ±3.51 mg/L) was significantly higher than that of patients in another group(4.62 ±2.09 mg/L).Conclusion The clinical efficacy of 5-ASA in combination with Lactobacillus is substantially better than that of 5-ASA alone.
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2012年第19期1527-1528,共2页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词 溃疡性结肠炎 益生菌 疗效 Ulcerative colitis Rrobiotics Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献33

  • 1溃疡性结肠炎的诊断及疗效标准[J].中华消化杂志,1993,13(6):354-354. 被引量:1064
  • 2刘少平,方春华,余立群,王丹,何仁胜,董卫国.溃疡性结肠炎患者血C反应蛋白活性与尿白蛋白含量的变化及其临床意义[J].医师进修杂志,2005,28(9):36-37. 被引量:5
  • 3Sartor RB. Mechaaisms of disease: pathogenesis of Crohnb disease and ulcerative colitis [ J ]. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2006,3 (7) :390 -407.
  • 4Capfilli R, Viseido A, LateUa G. Current management of severe ulcera- tive colitis [ J ]. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007,4 (2) :92 - 101.
  • 5Rodgers AD, Cummins AG. CRP correlates with clinical score in ulcer- ative colitis but not in Crohn's disease[ J ]. Dig Dis Sci, 2007,52 (9) : 2063 - 2068.
  • 6Danesh J, Whineup P, Walker M, et al. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta - analyses [J]. BMJ, 2000,321(7255) :199 -204.
  • 7Solem CA, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, et al. Correlation of C - reac- tive protein with clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and radiographic ac- tivity in inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2005,11 (8) :707 -712.
  • 8Zilberman L, Maharshak N, Arbel Y, et al. Correlated expression of high - sensitivity C - reactive protein in relation to disease activity in in- flammatory bowel disease: lack of differences between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [ J ]. Digestion, 2006,73 (4) :205 - 209.
  • 9MacDonald TT, Monteleone G, Render SL. Recent developments in immunology of Inflammatory bowel disease. Scand-J-Immunol, 2000,51 ( 1 ) : 2 - 9.
  • 10Linskens RK,Huijsdens XW,Savelkoul PH.et al. Thebacterial flora in inflammatory bowel disease: current insights in pathogenesis and the influence of antibiotics and probiotics. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2001,36 ( Suppl 234 ) :29 -40.

共引文献887

同被引文献96

引证文献9

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部